From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A2D48E8E for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC34F68D228; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 20:32:50 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com (mail-pl1-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79A6C68D1EC for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 20:32:43 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1d50d0c98c3so34046325ad.1 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:32:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ob-encoder-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1706553161; x=1707157961; darn=ffmpeg.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Vfmq1DA5mCoSLpOSoAvZSOAlD3wnXhKwDD6nFsMpn7I=; b=BmsxLgRdcc188Qg4q/9XVMOkYCfAH1MNS1NtoqtaAKcJYh48L/wEO/TcGLLW63/W55 ynY1G+c588jEjeELRz0GKpqRO571cpzCgd+Qr8ePYwHOShY2tDqEkj5siAz+8GcGjHN7 DjVQTOiz1tyC13WCkiqIVD9sF8mNgn6CYcV7ehRenFPe+Kuo2eLUJrJOjCPlxYIbB9X9 NNUgh9RBM+qLTg+rDsIvi2u08juevHvWNDKrNxHzeYf1DVOScMiCXurNcD5nNhIDFIxC WmmahajqKMDRvn05Dsx0DOjW0qUcYaoOTrQ4Be3iI4fEQTwiAlxxjp11nX7FVN7d9gGI 1cqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706553161; x=1707157961; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Vfmq1DA5mCoSLpOSoAvZSOAlD3wnXhKwDD6nFsMpn7I=; b=Lw6SOpFS9Em/kziavL2I+7L0YL2mUBQNjhInnzxuFPxWCKgD8fbGEadQcRbQQMRXID bfLVnYaNM3xu2lZnyn2Ba7MqV/aQylgzX9wK9gnUYY98ZeKeiYOmIIkKzcWfhlzSnzj2 Mw0EdbjmSAlOuM9iqVrPV5w8b91GqrQWvAmDG749LikJn2a7dW1LzecQTIrk0qtH5RY+ FHlB3sZDdtR1mfCjub+nSpXQYbQne0dSSG2slgUmfGjvdCgsXsY4nHCnN/dPPly5Eg9t T9cK6ohnC7kiX8Pw7i3mdMxUaOuCzLyHJJMC0XSJIwx/1e5l5I4ssHq8YNhQ5yZQQLeK q2wQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzGpqJsXS1j9ZnCyB+a65Hpyu/CEu9GnJPLQuYkMT1RZg9aZ75c SJNTmSvrP5AX1JHOAzH3ng/8L6TKI8KgPNB6+xqQu5sTHB0c6Ol7rDY5aMrEs1H5Rfc1NcGx/rC lvIdNd4D0vVYga7+y3oqYQkBA9KpEAUg8FCfxRg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHr6UfLkxMK3EM4NPG5KM3bta4mo8wN6d/zgHCOAeXxwO2FEuTiozRcBOOGADrk+zxk0nszuLdjunuXuFZslt0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:680e:b0:28f:ee83:13cd with SMTP id p14-20020a17090a680e00b0028fee8313cdmr7418345pjj.0.1706553161588; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:32:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240128032549.GN6420@pb2> <20240128171233.GO6420@pb2> <20240128200620.GP6420@pb2> <20240128214706.GS6420@pb2> In-Reply-To: <20240128214706.GS6420@pb2> From: Kieran Kunhya Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:31:30 +0000 Message-ID: To: Michael Niedermayer X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Sovereign Tech Fund X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Cc: Kieran Kunhya , "Jonatas L. Nogueira" , FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 at 21:47, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi Kieran > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 08:42:00PM +0000, Kieran Kunhya wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Jan 2024, 20:37 Kieran Kunhya, wrote: > > > > > Both work fine really. For example iam not employed by FFlabs and the > work > > >> i did for them is just by sending invoices, while what i do qualifies > > >> maintenance probably close to 100%. > > >> > > > > > > Fflabs is a private company that can choose however it likes how to > > > distribute its funds. STF/SPI/FFmpeg are not the same. > > > > > > Would you like every invoice you make to be on this mailing list and > > > discussed in depth in public? And if that invoice was voted against by > the > > > GA what would you do? > > > > > > Kieran > > > > > > > Remember the outcry about SDR that literally drove people away from the > > project? Well imagine that for one of your invoices. > > Do you mean it would drive them away because of how much or how little i > work for ? > Or becuase of what i work for ? > You refused to acknowledge the public outcry over SDR for months and pushed patches the community clearly objected to (see andreas thread). That could clearly apply to invoiced work that the community disagreed with. What would you do then? You weren't willing to compromise last time for your hobby, what makes you willing to compromise in that situation? I mean it basically happened already with SDR, just without an invoice. "I think you should try to bring the work you want funded into the framework that they told us to use. Instead of complaining" And now you follow the same tactics with Derek. Accusing people of disagree with you of spreading resentment. Kieran Sent from my mobile device _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".