From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A609740B62 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 17:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC6068B28F; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 19:29:51 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail-il1-f170.google.com (mail-il1-f170.google.com [209.85.166.170]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59BAF68B281 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 19:29:45 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail-il1-f170.google.com with SMTP id e8so5383560ilm.13 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 09:29:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandflow-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=LdVjWX0R5K/8Lu1SshC2oqXu/LUiS22Q9yxVk8yaZrI=; b=Ix+UOFVxWyn8+XVq9+5zsdG2upJf02g4NKvm3TMLg/s46n/NwJ2CPjpsn+9AIlcVf1 QqM+UStJwJoi4m5T+qVdCDZU1gRC+eCHR6mK3dE8GMOPIa84APkpV4dJsAYK708SJZI4 F7/2gOhP4nr+2PEKGWGUkGssZBGJPDb2wICfODt6OFq1X+sFlLl1kQ4jZeblW+ekLUvp VE/HOvP0gBgADTOe2iQR8g9zUCbwCp4F9Tm0wOXIK/crfmWTvBSTYM6Zzs2MNSdH9pgh +2jU/QbGAwzy2GCEKfegP+X0zIlRR3if3NPeycab1Cvt1/sSbAJsf/QILxRqWyZZoIMN dgBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=LdVjWX0R5K/8Lu1SshC2oqXu/LUiS22Q9yxVk8yaZrI=; b=J5wUvGSnb14IHyQTQn30agXAcrMEvlo7t7neH+Fs419EOketcJB9Uas0L60HHxWysC pnzMq6f4adlin0k09FzQNlPujO6pIRDwOKt1I2MfqiKHGJiY88c2DOYqRlF3sxG/bXe1 WZxoDGZQrp7wPeT8mZoWTvSNqzG5SDE1lpO3M91smBvrITl1Wzsf5qynJTlRasUQuSTL BDCLRlKYvlZAbLO+Lk3278ZtDSpPtm6x3Y7b4jcPe3sC3cy5ChVxokLqYNEp0JZqN3m5 fHJOgEsh2cMsosFhKtACuCqlk1NLpVk92f7vmChAbZzb0PzxbXfzT7WnPp5D1JRK42+5 1Bqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jBAZI6LC91AUJq5joa5DYvsbuTusRCoXku/1bN/qZXHK0QCZ+ EP4mVrUkw4H2x35itz09QT/BOeByTf8ayA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx8haPd6bFjUM8ZwqTDnNm7Pj1VJ0CtNIQT3/SamYDYbDDHepB8hiYkq79HA978gNNpprpQmw== X-Received: by 2002:a92:190f:: with SMTP id 15mr103117ilz.82.1643995783409; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 09:29:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-io1-f45.google.com (mail-io1-f45.google.com. [209.85.166.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y6sm1229072ilj.32.2022.02.04.09.29.42 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Feb 2022 09:29:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-f45.google.com with SMTP id s18so8174885ioa.12 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 09:29:42 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a02:7a56:: with SMTP id z22mr84929jad.304.1643995781975; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 09:29:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220107091625.8831-1-zane@zanevaniperen.com> In-Reply-To: From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 09:29:30 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/imf: s/++i/i++/g X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 11:58 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > > Never apply this. I am not a maintainer and so cannot apply the patch. There is another minor patch that has also been outstanding for some time now: https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/list/?series=5700 > Very sorry state of project. Can you be more specific? Are you referring to code style issues? If so, there is a draft patch at [1]. [1] https://github.com/sandflow/ffmpeg-imf/pull/85 I have been reluctant to propose it until: (a) I am more confident in the expected coding style; and (b) issues logged in trac are fixed. Regarding (a), I asked the following question, which I never received feedback on: http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2022-January/290990.html This prompted me to work on expanding the code style documentation, which I mentioned on IRC and plan to proposed shortly: https://github.com/sandflow/ffmpeg-imf/pull/95 Regarding (b), the following patch is up for review: https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/list/?series=5873 I can prioritize (a) if folks feel this is the right approach. There is also an outstanding proposal [2] to refactor uuid functionality. Have you had a chance to review? [2] http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2022-January/291917.html > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".