Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/4] lavc/vp9dsp: R-V V ipred dc

[flow gg <hlefthleft@gmail.com>]

I don't quite understand, I think here 8x8 because zve64x is not suitable
for sharing, it shares between dc16x16 and dc32x32, there isn't much common
code, it would require adding 3 if-else statements and function parameters,
it feels okay not to extract too.

Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi@remlab.net> 于2024年3月27日周三 23:41写道：

> Le perjantaina 22. maaliskuuta 2024, 8.02.08 EET flow gg a écrit :
> > Using macros to shorten function definitions, updated in this response
>
> Did you try to share the common code after getdc and see how slower it is?
> If
> an extra static branch has negligible overhead, it would reduce binary
> size
> quite a bit here, AFAICT.
>
> --
> レミ・デニ-クールモン
> http://www.remlab.net/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".