[FFmpeg-devel] Request For Comment no Matroska specs

[FFmpeg-devel] Request For Comment no Matroska specs

[Steve Lhomme]

Hi ffmmpeg developers,

As you may know, we are working hard on the Matroska specifications at 
the IETF. We already got EBML as an RFC [1]. We are in the process of 
finalizing the main Matroska document. Before we submit the document for 
formal review before "final" publishing, we would like people who know a 
bit about Matroska to review the current draft in case there are parts 
missing, hard to decipher or, even worse, bugs.

This is a 200 pages document, so it may take a while. You can find draft 
09 at [2]. It should explain what is found in Matroska 1 to 4. Some 
unused elements have been deprecated since the original informal 
specifications. These elements can be found in Annex A.

Thanks

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8794/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cellar-matroska/
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Request For Comment no Matroska specs

[Steve Lhomme]

On 2022-04-01 14:33, Steve Lhomme wrote:
> Hi ffmmpeg developers,
> 
> As you may know, we are working hard on the Matroska specifications at 
> the IETF. We already got EBML as an RFC [1]. We are in the process of 
> finalizing the main Matroska document. Before we submit the document for 
> formal review before "final" publishing, we would like people who know a 
> bit about Matroska to review the current draft in case there are parts 
> missing, hard to decipher or, even worse, bugs.
> 
> This is a 200 pages document, so it may take a while. You can find draft 
> 09 at [2]. It should explain what is found in Matroska 1 to 4. Some 
> unused elements have been deprecated since the original informal 
> specifications. These elements can be found in Annex A.

I forgot to mention you can reply here or on the GitHub repository of 
the specs [3] by creating an issue or even a Pull Request.

[3] https://github.com/ietf-wg-cellar/matroska-specification

> Thanks
> 
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8794/
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cellar-matroska/
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> 
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Request For Comment no Matroska specs

[Martijn van Beurden]

Op vr 1 apr. 2022 14:53 schreef Steve Lhomme <robux4@ycbcr.xyz>:

> On 2022-04-01 14:33, Steve Lhomme wrote:
> > Hi ffmmpeg developers,
> >
> > As you may know, we are working hard on the Matroska specifications at
> > the IETF. We already got EBML as an RFC [1]. We are in the process of
> > finalizing the main Matroska document. Before we submit the document for
> > formal review before "final" publishing, we would like people who know a
> > bit about Matroska to review the current draft in case there are parts
> > missing, hard to decipher or, even worse, bugs.
> >
> > This is a 200 pages document, so it may take a while. You can find draft
> > 09 at [2]. It should explain what is found in Matroska 1 to 4. Some
> > unused elements have been deprecated since the original informal
> > specifications. These elements can be found in Annex A.
>
> I forgot to mention you can reply here or on the GitHub repository of
> the specs [3] by creating an issue or even a Pull Request.
>
> [3] https://github.com/ietf-wg-cellar/matroska-specification
>
> > Thanks
> >
> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8794/
> > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cellar-matroska/


There is also a HTML version of the draft available, which is perhaps
easier to read:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cellar-matroska-09.html
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Request For Comment no Matroska specs

[Martijn van Beurden]

As a gentle reminder, the Matroska specification can be commented on
until the 22th of this month, so for another 7 days, before it is
finalized and submitted to the IETF to start their review process. See
the message below for details

> Op vr 1 apr. 2022 14:53 schreef Steve Lhomme <robux4@ycbcr.xyz>:
>>
>> On 2022-04-01 14:33, Steve Lhomme wrote:
>> > Hi ffmmpeg developers,
>> >
>> > As you may know, we are working hard on the Matroska specifications at
>> > the IETF. We already got EBML as an RFC [1]. We are in the process of
>> > finalizing the main Matroska document. Before we submit the document for
>> > formal review before "final" publishing, we would like people who know a
>> > bit about Matroska to review the current draft in case there are parts
>> > missing, hard to decipher or, even worse, bugs.
>> >
>> > This is a 200 pages document, so it may take a while. You can find draft
>> > 09 at [2]. It should explain what is found in Matroska 1 to 4. Some
>> > unused elements have been deprecated since the original informal
>> > specifications. These elements can be found in Annex A.
>>
>> I forgot to mention you can reply here or on the GitHub repository of
>> the specs [3] by creating an issue or even a Pull Request.
>>
>> [3] https://github.com/ietf-wg-cellar/matroska-specification
>>
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8794/
>> > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cellar-matroska/

Op za 2 apr. 2022 om 11:27 schreef Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1@gmail.com>:
>
>
> There is also a HTML version of the draft available, which is perhaps easier to read:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cellar-matroska-09.html
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".