Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Request For Comment no Matroska specs

[Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1@gmail.com>]

Op vr 1 apr. 2022 14:53 schreef Steve Lhomme <robux4@ycbcr.xyz>:

> On 2022-04-01 14:33, Steve Lhomme wrote:
> > Hi ffmmpeg developers,
> >
> > As you may know, we are working hard on the Matroska specifications at
> > the IETF. We already got EBML as an RFC [1]. We are in the process of
> > finalizing the main Matroska document. Before we submit the document for
> > formal review before "final" publishing, we would like people who know a
> > bit about Matroska to review the current draft in case there are parts
> > missing, hard to decipher or, even worse, bugs.
> >
> > This is a 200 pages document, so it may take a while. You can find draft
> > 09 at [2]. It should explain what is found in Matroska 1 to 4. Some
> > unused elements have been deprecated since the original informal
> > specifications. These elements can be found in Annex A.
>
> I forgot to mention you can reply here or on the GitHub repository of
> the specs [3] by creating an issue or even a Pull Request.
>
> [3] https://github.com/ietf-wg-cellar/matroska-specification
>
> > Thanks
> >
> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8794/
> > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cellar-matroska/


There is also a HTML version of the draft available, which is perhaps
easier to read:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cellar-matroska-09.html
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".