Re: [FFmpeg-devel] forgejo labels

From: "Diederick C. Niehorster" <dcnieho@gmail.com>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] forgejo labels
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 16:40:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CABcAi1jH3E50nZN9JiD1g9GEZZpLuHuGSY_TXgYAPTiDhrLqUA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250728142057.GZ29660@pb2>

On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 4:21 PM Michael Niedermayer
<michael@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> regression: issue aaddresses a regression
> bug:        something is not working
>
> This is inconsistent
> Label X cannot sometimes mean "X is removed" and "X is added"
>
> bug seems meaning that the PR adds a bug
> regression seems meaning that the PR removes a regression
>
> IMO this should be done consistently
> a PR can have bugs and it can fix bugs
> a PR can cause regressions and it can fix regressions

so lets rename the labels to bug_fix, regression_fix and add has_bug
and has_regression. The former two colored green, the latter two
colored red.

Issues also need labels, and there "bug" and "regression" are fine,
indicating that an issue flags a bug instead of, e.g., a feature
request (and applying bug+regression makes sense).

All the best,
Dee
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".