[FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL] [VOTE] code.ffmpeg.org vs. ML

["Diederick C. Niehorster via ffmpeg-devel" <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>]

F

On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 10:50 AM Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
<ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> 2 months ago we voted on testing Forgejo vs Gitlab, we picked and tested
> Forgejo. And as said in that vote, (and surprisingly, i have not forgotten it)
> heres the "after testing" discussion and vote
>
> do we want to keep Forgejo or switch back to the ML workflow
> (or something else)
>
> F. keep Forgejo as primary forge for patch/git workflow
> M. switch back to the ML for patch/git workflow
>
> all GA members can vote, by publically replying here with a
> "F." / "Forgejo" vs "M." / "ML"
> End time is in 7 days unless teh community wants to extend that.
> (Also if results are inconclusive like because a 3rd option emerges
>  then ill restart this with condorcet on vote.ffmpeg.org)
>
> * If we keep forgejo we will likely transition our issue tracker tickets
>   into forgejo too, discussing with timo yesterday night indicates that
>   this likely can be done cleaner and neater than at first expected.
>
> * if we switch back to the ML, we still could have subsystem maintainers
>   using their own forge
>
>
> thx
>
> --
> Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
>
> I have often repented speaking, but never of holding my tongue.
> -- Xenocrates
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to ffmpeg-devel-leave@ffmpeg.org
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ffmpeg-devel-leave@ffmpeg.org