Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Romain Beauxis <romain.beauxis@gmail.com>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Cc: Marvin Scholz <epirat07@gmail.com>, Lynne <dev@lynne.ee>,
	Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] ogg/vorbis: implement header packet skip in chained ogg bitstreams.
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 10:59:07 -0500
Message-ID: <CABWZ6OS=H3JcX-=C9W3X9mc0a2wL5+0P_YMf4RdkJkTYVyhY9Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250804082133.GS29660@pb2>

Le lun. 4 août 2025 à 03:21, Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc> a
écrit :
>
> Hi Romain
>
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 02:11:03AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi Romain
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 03, 2025 at 05:50:17PM -0500, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > > Le dim. 3 août 2025 à 16:36, Michael Niedermayer
> > > <michael@niedermayer.cc> a écrit :
> > [...]
> > > > > Do you have any advice on how to look for a reviewer for this
path?
> > > >
> > > > social media, like twitter
> > > >
> > > > also if it has a positive vibe then we can retweet
> > >
> > > Respectfully, this does not make sense to me.
> >
> > i dont have time ATM, and it seems the others also are overloaded
> >
> > -> so the goal is to attract more reviewing manpower
> >
> > but surely eventually someone will have time and look at it
> > also this is not the most trivial patchset
>
> I ve reviewed your patch on
https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/20026 now

Thank for your review and your time.

In my previous message I did not mean to direct the whole concern to you in
particular.

> you ignored review comments made previously

Truly speaking, I did not understand them and/or lost track. I think that I
do now and I'm glad that they'll remain on the PR history for future
reference.

> The patch also contained a trivial mistake:
> (maybe review your own code if you have time and reviewers are all busy)
> (also as said previously (IIRC) if reviewers are all busy, help review
other peoples
>  patches)
>         priv->comment_size = 0;
>         av_freep(&priv->setup);
>         priv->comment_size = 0;

Thanks for spotting that out.

I have addressed all your comments:
* Added back legacy ogg vorbis frame decode headers parsing, split them
into vorbis_decode_legacy_frame_headers and vorbis_decode_frame_headers for
better proofreading.
* Split commits into libavf and libavc
* Added proper API bump.

It looks like the API bump will be required before the release since libavf
is already shipping with bitstream modifications on ogg/opus and ogg/flac.

> Also its summer vacation time and everyone is busy

I understand that.

Should the release be then pushed back to when other people are back to get
more people and eyes on what's needed beforehand?

Thanks,
-- Romain
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

      reply	other threads:[~2025-08-04 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-04 16:58 Romain Beauxis
2025-06-10 18:04 ` Romain Beauxis
2025-06-12 11:35   ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-06-14 10:39     ` Romain Beauxis
2025-06-14 22:57 ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-06-21  8:45   ` Romain Beauxis
2025-06-21 21:59     ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-07-23 19:06       ` Romain Beauxis
2025-07-28  0:22         ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-07-28 21:12           ` Romain Beauxis
2025-08-03 21:36             ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-08-03 22:50               ` Romain Beauxis
2025-08-04  0:11                 ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-08-04  0:19                   ` Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
2025-08-04 10:53                     ` Nicolas George
2025-08-04  8:21                   ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-08-04 15:59                     ` Romain Beauxis [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABWZ6OS=H3JcX-=C9W3X9mc0a2wL5+0P_YMf4RdkJkTYVyhY9Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=romain.beauxis@gmail.com \
    --cc=andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com \
    --cc=dev@lynne.ee \
    --cc=epirat07@gmail.com \
    --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
		ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
	public-inbox-index ffmpegdev

Example config snippet for mirrors.


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git