From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B1E34BEE9 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2025 20:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59E168CF6F; Sat, 26 Jul 2025 23:15:41 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail-ed1-f52.google.com (mail-ed1-f52.google.com [209.85.208.52]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0AFA68C600 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2025 23:15:34 +0300 (EEST) Received: by mail-ed1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-60bfcada295so5190062a12.1 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2025 13:15:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1753560933; x=1754165733; darn=ffmpeg.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=khc/pHDlE6pvczwJdq2Hx5EgSE4LvUVsR30VYzxfVTg=; b=byNlqlqVARdTlyC44kQZTQuNH+0ZKroqytlA8pZa2FNwYdjxnlGtuGpjJbvhkmxHHM SY5mLZU355T/SUSbvrvNGhGuwdXn5OJRbZBCu6x5aaAomRrk0iixa0/8MFamYbSmXBiA v6KV19I9c1JJC4xZWnS3g3/uzvPpCa5SpvdWMxaL7a9scBGFOZNpv8xMPXHV8Qsfbln9 MuoyeHDuE4jgD/UJYTIfIKAbhN/TfOE5Gsw77KHXio/WIVMWOgtWI112taOKs4dWbMzo rumGhMTF0R+GctKPbax9TXZjzDlWdAZpoCed8WeiNQJJR/HL2dAQpjYb9V3uUV106rhs h42A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1753560933; x=1754165733; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=khc/pHDlE6pvczwJdq2Hx5EgSE4LvUVsR30VYzxfVTg=; b=u05cZVj9dePmK1NBZsp1XainVr95v7VKWyw49xI0d6xE64LA1Am/6TzVn/rJ1I92xT pBrDEcY/wewFP/DdIaJfxFTj7mOopPjm048e36zRGGrZnG5mDiaKQ9+pcEQS4fp/4mlb mSFurQnLWYn9XvkPPeHULfm9cdaFcInO1atZ79kdoOHpgxZiARWpueqGE5seoSoVxGZ3 hdMLxDI3SNCM9gsSA3J7g0+/20pxRVaGzdkbW2/f4VOYJoBjyIKXdwqWMsCsPa1+MFLq ri1l2hmoc9ppXUNVrV07zTHh0FHnnmdVq64L4OMyyS1LCNZ3KDTjMerNBdina/gijQ2v Ayjg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzodyGqP605bnm/X+009unmXmWeDRL2tcpYWlMyS4Fqq+mLIraa Fvy7QQq7d+v80OjQgv0oz4ewgnsFXKHcIduJc+qcJisP3xAbp9MtQjQnqQ4mOgtonvfLFEOA3kc Qjv4fbi+XhHE8CFhcBh+otNmWqbR6lFSBwg== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv+JLtObXXlh5+p/eAh+A671VRoNMHtfq30puk1ZTFdm7+dg/Fx4bCfrbEaQXt cC8lMyeDaj4pb+8bK1VGqZYuCpvuoQkqgqC3fjK2wlh5fSTg+nchyCrPI0O3R4tf4H1B8qPNSYN d54muSsvzqsrKD1sxK+49NjG5Gpey3LV0yyBVglreG1hIDRLsIe/4p2tUsPPETx4P/SD47p23Jq fcI X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHtKokW/EyBIPbOIpcuTtlil9Ijl9vMaiEQ7oFOOAH97R8YOiR4frMAI0UZ9A4rLKGKJTa9fU6VAxmNUO/nqqw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:26c1:b0:607:f513:4808 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-614f1bd61e4mr5598194a12.1.1753560933141; Sat, 26 Jul 2025 13:15:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250722035337.2216565-1-dev@lynne.ee> In-Reply-To: From: Kacper Michajlow Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 22:14:59 +0200 X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXznSQeMTa2tenYr2N3vqZE463fOYr9AXD4ivppLbC1vsNb7TY49WzeAM2E Message-ID: To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] web: announce code.ffmpeg.org X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: n Sat, 26 Jul 2025 at 21:29, Timo Rothenpieler wrote: > > On 7/26/2025 7:03 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > > On 7/22/2025 4:53 AM, Lynne wrote: > >> --- > >> src/contact | 11 +++++++++++ > >> src/index | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+) > > > > So I am a bit unclear, is development now Forgejo or ML, or both? > > > > Because right now, it seems like both, and that is basically the worst > > possible outcome. It is very difficult to follow both, and the amount > > of people reviewing or even looking at patches on either is now significantly > > splintered/reduced, allowing lower quality code to wade itself in the meantime, > > IMO. > > > > Also, as far as I can tell, the git access list was not really carried over in > > any way. > > > > It all seems a bit chaotic and directionless... or rather, with 0 plan. > > It's still an extended test. You cannot push to it, since it's just a > mirror. > > How do you expect to suddenly switch every last person over from the ML > to a new tool? > There's always going to be a transition period where both are in use, > gradually shifting. > So yes, for now there needs to be eyes on both. > > Hopefully pushing to it/hitting the merge button should be possible soon > (hinges on cooperation with Videolan) I agree with Derek on this topic, I think it is unreasonable to have two ways to merge patches into the main repository. Once the "merge button" is operational, all direct push to the repository should be restricted and always required to go through PR. There may still be communication/review overlap between ML/forgejo, but ultimately it should go through one path of merge/approve. - Kacper _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".