From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53FC496EB for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 15:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53B768DAD6; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 18:49:35 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail-ed1-f50.google.com (mail-ed1-f50.google.com [209.85.208.50]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8537368D9A4 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 18:49:29 +0300 (EEST) Received: by mail-ed1-f50.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-58ba3e38028so8526100a12.0 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 08:49:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1721231368; x=1721836168; darn=ffmpeg.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1IBTeoQuGAwEu5hsHP5VWcBAvlg8Y9+oQp4YbFCtQB0=; b=JirjgxiD5x8IkrQ89Td6zxwFTzPwukjPZ9vyPu1D7DrkGbQFRQXtawtV8+XvdZcKxX +FNZBuQoXTQMfhTiBM2wbygxxLhLQ70UEq6SuPnEBTqFucK/i1zGhRZAlqpZgIyGGspt sRQjQi0OKrvRrsgGLIyfzXWshYqvtWYplLF/N/B6iH/VsjmnrPdJE3anw+/xN2ux2Z/e kKJnaDs5zPJ7sFp1eHIWmABfnYmq7kgDrSf7Rzj5oqmoo5y0TefaUz9cS2vIUUuMzyR+ BYTp+F6Hv5HAiL2NAQp20FrXY2kWMQQXCnB2ysjEp66nJw4dHgRTgJkVX5P8cyVrTvdQ ngtQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1721231368; x=1721836168; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1IBTeoQuGAwEu5hsHP5VWcBAvlg8Y9+oQp4YbFCtQB0=; b=uKmZ2TG2Fpiwcz6S62XO7j29gtcZXtIoUa6PbRjHBuJ9WPSJoJMFgedrMBt528t930 SSib/46LFxKwh9j4JjrxwXl5AZ1sA6efy0E1Aw/l/pl3H61nEVb8GvM0T1GQt4v80bpR kG66Ev2e7f6fDC4psnDVtuBO64oUpXKqIHyeSj2zfFQZP23XXZ2atWvFzALm6rA9aPbD PTPPymlrGtNnQNuxXH4ouJtUuf2977LpYkeIeXBRLdepRWjKdaYXovhQYjAqU7QLxNFQ lov5qKoH4JJYXzlRAjEfhEP8lrLNWUKiaaO433Nrj/P2ySkLiga9Ww4zWleFNtZ75WVL WJaA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxYcfB26Q8UEsIYOKFTijV9B4XXyPanCJ6m2ifhSFk6B7FqsE+p bT9AogdA4Wh4ytuAt1LznMJmDS4s3l+dJHkGngpzuL52vBhohhOmZIuii/GEuaALFGnHkWqxqfW 2t95WAVdGcWaOifKejnotVyAKHehhU6f0AFQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHaUIo5ZB8TX2/9MTQxW0n8ns7aY57dhyM1XyjAfqv+fDMmYG9Xi8Am+kmFM2KtGkg9Oj8xukVfdMNxLMDMspI= X-Received: by 2002:a50:d71b:0:b0:594:4d8d:8cc6 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5a05d6bd880mr1163928a12.40.1721231368412; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 08:49:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Kacper Michajlow Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 17:49:00 +0200 Message-ID: To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] avisynth as an internal filter, any objections? X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 03:21, Roger Pack wrote: > > Hi all, just wondering, if I were to write a libavfilter that > basically "called out" to avisynth and had it process stuff, would > there be any ideological pushback, or would it possibly be accepted? > Cheers! Have you considered VapourSynth instead? AviSynth days of glory are long over. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".