Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc: remove the QOA decoder

From: Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giovara@gmail.com>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc: remove the QOA decoder
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:42:01 -0500
Message-ID: <CABLWnS8i-sn=op-m1QQCqhG6jwaO3EhH2b5B=p7ga_Qn-dnRsQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZW86zlIUfEVagKO9@phare.normalesup.org>

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:59 AM Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> wrote:

> Vittorio Giovara (12023-12-05):
> > I'm not bickering,
>
> That is exactly what you do.
>

And you are not? The view must be great from that glass house

> actively include testing as part of the bare minimum process to accept the
> > patch/review is harming the whole generation of developers.
>
> I agree that Paul's attitude is utterly toxic to the project, but
> Anton's attitude of removing features is way worse. At least Paul almost
> only pollutes his own code.
>

Your attitude for "omgfeatures" is also pretty toxic, there are heaps of
literature about feature creep and how important it is to remove dead code.

> As for harming a whole generation, it is the same vague argument used by
> everybody to condemn anything they do not like, like homosexuality for
> example, and that argument is always the same level of bullshit.
>

Uhhh, but maybe I'm just misinterpreting your message, but that looks like
a very ignorant comparison.
-- 
Vittorio
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".