Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giovara@gmail.com>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] I've written a filter in Rust
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:25:23 +0100
Message-ID: <CABLWnS8XREA3Y5wPixZMt3Ydeh+jecX5E3hhejHbLXMGQG_-UA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM8P223MB0365B81C21D603724C837982BAC72@DM8P223MB0365.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 3:30 PM Soft Works <
softworkz-at-hotmail.com@ffmpeg.org> wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
> > Michael Niedermayer
> > Sent: Freitag, 21. Februar 2025 14:22
> > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-
> > devel@ffmpeg.org>
> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] I've written a filter in Rust
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:01:56AM +0100, Tomas Härdin wrote:
> > > tor 2025-02-20 klockan 23:49 +0100 skrev Michael Niedermayer:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 02:06:47PM +0100, Leandro Santiago wrote:
> > > > > [insert meme here]
> > > > [...]
> > > > > I also recorded a video showing the filter in action [7].
> > > > [...
> > > > > [7] https://youtu.be/U_y4-NnaINg
> > > >
> > > > cool, it doesnt detect everyone though
> > > >
> > > > also i think this shows how useful a plugin framework would be for
> > > > ffmpeg
> > > >
> > > > with plugins everyone could use,test and contribute to this today.
> > > > without plugins, this needs to be merged in ffmpeg git master. (which
> > > > will take some time i suspect)
> > >
> > > Have we not gone over and rejected plugins many times? I recall points
> >
> > no
> > there was no formal and no public informal vote that i remember.
> >
> > ive raised the issue with plugins many times. Because it would
> > allow people and myself to contribute more complex features and
> > end the stagnation of FFmpeg.
>
> Yup, that's exactly one of the reasons why other projects like GStreamer
> have gained that much popularity. It might not have happened when
> ffmpeg would have been more open and extensible in the first place.
>

The popularity was gained because it is easier to bundle in closed source
applications which I think we all agree it's not the direction we should be
going towards. Also their community is welcoming developers instead of
actively pushing them away with conspiracy or governance talks.

What do you people think about the feasibility of a compile-time plugin
> mechanism?


Bad idea, as others have expressed in more detail.
-- 
Vittorio
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-26 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-20 13:06 Leandro Santiago
2025-02-20 16:20 ` Leandro Santiago
2025-02-20 22:49 ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-02-21  7:56   ` Leandro Santiago
2025-02-21  9:01   ` Tomas Härdin
2025-02-21  9:21     ` Soft Works
2025-02-21 13:21     ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-02-21 14:30       ` Soft Works
2025-02-21 14:53         ` Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
2025-02-21 15:02           ` Soft Works
2025-02-21 19:27             ` Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
2025-02-21 20:10               ` Soft Works
2025-02-26 13:50                 ` Tomas Härdin
2025-02-26 14:18                   ` Zhao Zhili
2025-02-26 15:32                     ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2025-02-26 16:03                       ` Zhao Zhili
2025-02-26 16:25                         ` martin schitter
2025-02-26 14:07                 ` Nicolas George
2025-02-26 16:35                   ` Soft Works
2025-02-21 16:39           ` Stephen Hutchinson
2025-02-26 14:25         ` Vittorio Giovara [this message]
2025-02-21 13:18 ` Lynne
2025-02-21 13:44   ` Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
2025-02-21 18:02   ` Tomas Härdin
2025-02-22 12:57     ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2025-02-23 21:30       ` Tomas Härdin
2025-02-23 21:51         ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-02-26 14:11           ` Tomas Härdin
2025-02-24 14:51         ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2025-02-26 14:34           ` Tomas Härdin
2025-02-26 15:13           ` Leandro Santiago
2025-02-22 12:49   ` Rémi Denis-Courmont

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CABLWnS8XREA3Y5wPixZMt3Ydeh+jecX5E3hhejHbLXMGQG_-UA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=vittorio.giovara@gmail.com \
    --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
		ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
	public-inbox-index ffmpegdev

Example config snippet for mirrors.


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git