[FFmpeg-devel] Re: FFmpeg "supporters" doxing

[Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>]

>
>
> > And again, the more important aspect here is that Kieran was *asking*,
> not
> > publishing, what *business*, not person, sits at a given already
> published
>
> The litteral text from kieran was
>
> "Who does this address belong to?"
> and "who" normally implies a person.
>
> All above said, if the CC refuses to act on this, obviously that proofs my
> point
> which was that "the CC is not acting on this". May that be, because the
> data was
> there in form of a question, or it was a too long ago, or whatever.
>
> While there seem to be action in other cases of doxxing.
>

"Who" can apply to a company in English. To use Grok's explanation:

""Who" in English is traditionally used for people, but in modern
usage—especially in questions about ownership, registration, or
association—it is commonly extended to organizations, businesses, or legal
entities."

Kieran

>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ffmpeg-devel-leave@ffmpeg.org