From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33F664EFA9 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2025 16:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C0D68CFC1; Sat, 14 Jun 2025 19:28:27 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail-yb1-f171.google.com (mail-yb1-f171.google.com [209.85.219.171]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AE9D68BE10 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2025 19:28:20 +0300 (EEST) Received: by mail-yb1-f171.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e7dc7245bcdso330284276.2 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2025 09:28:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proxyid.net; s=google; t=1749918498; x=1750523298; darn=ffmpeg.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=o2jl6z9x9GL/DrLLU7n5BZ/wCJCYQsu9krk6H6Q9U8s=; b=e0JM+fBgv4FtVxbzhxiZxLYhnWoTLP6x3zxcbfCRnZ6QWGYoLMVqd4BctnBzUY1WhR F04Ur74p3Ebde14lLBsrIlaRvrhjIn5yktRsXAlnKfSsry4FRo2COE5SYA+umKyMl13h i2XVk6PCOQG6XnKZB+qBv+4qZkn38Nejom4l6LUj2sPpwXJrLuZ9vXNRSwi9YAE3ofrm 2qrVR9OzEyi4iem+odOyTfS64Alkl1AIQgkfWJ7WquIXihbNZG1Z/NPb94T+lnfvvh7D CmF1nq/J+fjJmy84IviPfVi//4y8SapNeosP+DrDTexukWcgLKUEWNSNsrCyHYvvHJET lnPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1749918498; x=1750523298; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=o2jl6z9x9GL/DrLLU7n5BZ/wCJCYQsu9krk6H6Q9U8s=; b=jkOfWk2ehquNN0hgjuRR6R2pSyFI5obtcbMV+5ObfALSj/XvqS0R2MaGtfwG8nkc7m Wsfixu+wTtsVfPc0FApZz4SsKSZAn5SLzHbQHBQ8+USL01bqzawADYkCSzG4dBF14DSv DRXaZI2WOv4Y7ETe5pxrWVCQSVQjF3D8h5gTY+7nIZ/QFnlnKmcwyD9zVlxwnv5idZQN aD1YIqrho6BGQ8i40EDT32N9Qz+NaGawmLjxqsQfZmiqI+Vh4sVH5F660iO7tNdbw8+2 l9/iSuMWXOkSj3hw/1uZ9vvD8dzCq2nT38aYTcHr3eIB2L6VmasuoNE63mWZOMwPYp+q 3LtQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwqDmhh2cYqNyq7b94tblj0Qhp9nkdRnI7ZrKV5YwhY9Z+beO5q G8rcZu4GyCVJhGfdWKBBmiUIaBCGiSLLKeAMC/q1+S6QJSJ16Sy8eG9cDEMJ6zZzoqTpUHLgvOZ Kw0PRumcq34aoFZOCsSkXFLO93hPmKQ+iBZ0EuWKKxmbEnoD/NK8H X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvgcIcGaC6ESR4YCe8n7Mqk/WFR3wdWk49CL6gnH9dJs/vLRJN6YnhFTvI5/E6 DjlXP/iSkJs4NUMUUKIMEEnGNp/MKTGpv5GA+0j/tPl/7Tf+cPIhv3FC6OeQUu7iJVCfhmnH7d8 I0qa6MMYYt5oOJmP5XdZmXsjVsRtU2euqAi245UFQDweU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH6zvIlNkoMvP3HQtSzN8r8HosNZ3C9SVzpt2/fZ3pHppG0NZSUqiw+V/LPN1PuxSKpjeqv1eMQ7KXI4ApuTJ0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:61c9:b0:70d:ecdd:9bc5 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-711752fff76mr22639837b3.0.1749918498465; Sat, 14 Jun 2025 09:28:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250101215300.760422-1-ffmpeg@fratti.ch> <89176776-c797-497c-a34c-94dd059ea137@lynne.ee> <99c58974-aba6-4c4f-8530-9bbcb7811634@fratti.ch> In-Reply-To: <99c58974-aba6-4c4f-8530-9bbcb7811634@fratti.ch> From: Marth64 Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 11:27:42 -0500 X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFuZdamzI3Wen486uKpndNhxwcVVyNEx-joYFkn733DEnNytVp_Xdne5Imw Message-ID: To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] avformat/http: Add max_request_size option X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Hello, bringing this back from the grave. Nicolas Frattaroli: > if I'll change it to anything then maybe max_requested_size, but > max_range_size seems less clear to me because that it does this through > the range header is not relevant to the user, its effect is, which is > that FFmpeg requests less data per sent request. I align with your logic about naming toward the effect, and max_requested_size makes sense. As for the concurrency concern, can you help me understand it a bit more with an example? In this way I can research it (or if there are any SMEs please step in). Zhao's statement about potential server flooding is also valid. If there's strong opinion from others there I think its worth to hear. In my eyes someone can accomplish the same effect with changing header values directly or using curl. It my also be for legitimate reasons. Thank you all, Marth64 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".