From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB3243909 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2023 23:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC7F68BCDD; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 01:36:05 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail-lj1-f179.google.com (mail-lj1-f179.google.com [209.85.208.179]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6561068BCC2 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 01:35:59 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail-lj1-f179.google.com with SMTP id g14so30244732ljh.10 for ; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 15:35:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PvacURLaAuDWwnAyFrBIdt0dslsKvEZ5XvW3nabUtkw=; b=BYsBWnY31RS5nCxD1KSN3YuXJVkaBumesSSfxT2OsK9utXVwt3P6e9RK7hOTfeZy83 H2Bor+eh/3T8ym3gyYfG1hhjPquZwp1fYWpJfA4k4zJdd3DpP+xSOUG5NjziG9mOQ6L5 njzDLNbE3i7ru6SocmUEbAdQeoTgELlx0TZham1eHb3UP4nTOYxxGwg4QwUbsA0bOwI+ E/eGQkyO1YdD259HiQM9PB4M9TT6JBp6wTIiD6TGBpYsVcpfTC8bVeBsK0MEoVDkG1BZ CW0RUQUhWA5YKhBrPxkp8o9fvuHD0LHC+Col0szXfBTYUs2dKpqVijtoV1ZlAk+Wb5mw nGfQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PvacURLaAuDWwnAyFrBIdt0dslsKvEZ5XvW3nabUtkw=; b=hLg8UYTWC+/yzPqK5Z97RZicrnxZjTN7tnsvJyGJP03KEPEJrBCDIBEe1+ZuAIkRha 0U8ehLfzTjozYCRDtWUKJ6TzvV2bOXiN0YiKFUrXTbyNHDQSbtpHyf3FbwJTcsy4BlVc U2a55kAHpIWGsVMeFDfin/lx7ascwEf0q45Z5s1Mym+zmD6zuSnBzXaW1G750YS14kaw HrIenVyvHuUB7E6IuQdqyDTSBfAAcW27JAHxX9gZ3zSVp6N1tmiScI2AVIIelrj04jTj /h6IwFsjt9l1e8HuieCPDvTOo30pq+VFVbx6k18meEnzLqNW7SsKslbzAiLoVi+4+sxl zwwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqtzqNFkjc954PRufmwWOxPtQUMFRz8switrNEj4pNSDpm80QtC 7MCrbjiR2sPk49hMjoL3NhZhhqCni28MmZl4fhAEgXJWee0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXuYZTg2BdPQF04aeIbdHaJm9cBRHFOl7z/ddG4I4PkpCBYZ+tsB4choVE0g5625EYOS19xyPeqgHu1mDky2WaI= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9c94:0:b0:27f:e246:86b6 with SMTP id x20-20020a2e9c94000000b0027fe24686b6mr919430lji.138.1672702557612; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 15:35:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230102230128.972907-1-ccom@randomderp.com> In-Reply-To: <20230102230128.972907-1-ccom@randomderp.com> From: Hendrik Leppkes Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 00:35:43 +0100 Message-ID: To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] get_cabac_inline_x86: Don't inline if 32-bit Windows X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 12:01 AM Christopher Degawa wrote: > > previouslly, it only was an issue with 32-bit clang from msys2's > mingw32 repo, however, at some point with an update to gcc 12.2.0, > the same issue popped up. Tested with a clean clone of ffmpeg, and even > tested with n5.0, but the issue persists, so I presume it's a compiler > issue. > > Related: https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/8903 > I regularly build with 12.2 on win32 and its fine. In fact, there is a fate station for that: https://fate.ffmpeg.org/report.cgi?slot=x86_32-mingw-w64-dll-windows-native&time=20230102232810 So if you are seeing this issue, more details that trigger it will be required, and maybe a more targeted fix. - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".