[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/filter: fix typos in introduction with the word 'unlabelled'

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/filter: fix typos in introduction with the word 'unlabelled'

[Marth64]

Signed-off-by: Marth64 <marth64@proxyid.net>
---
 doc/filters.texi | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/filters.texi b/doc/filters.texi
index f4084ff494..eff2256fef 100644
--- a/doc/filters.texi
+++ b/doc/filters.texi
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ filtergraph, a link between the corresponding input and output pad is
 created.
 
 If an output pad is not labelled, it is linked by default to the first
-unlabelled input pad of the next filter in the filterchain.
+unlabeled input pad of the next filter in the filterchain.
 For example in the filterchain
 @example
 nullsrc, split[L1], [L2]overlay, nullsink
@@ -204,13 +204,13 @@ the split filter instance has two output pads, and the overlay filter
 instance two input pads. The first output pad of split is labelled
 "L1", the first input pad of overlay is labelled "L2", and the second
 output pad of split is linked to the second input pad of overlay,
-which are both unlabelled.
+which are both unlabeled.
 
 In a filter description, if the input label of the first filter is not
 specified, "in" is assumed; if the output label of the last filter is not
 specified, "out" is assumed.
 
-In a complete filterchain all the unlabelled filter input and output
+In a complete filterchain all the unlabeled filter input and output
 pads must be connected. A filtergraph is considered valid if all the
 filter input and output pads of all the filterchains are connected.
 
-- 
2.34.1

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/filter: fix typos in introduction with the word 'unlabelled'

[Marth64]

Kindly disregard. This is not actually a typo, it is valid regional
English. Sorry. Just ignore this one.

On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 4:51 PM Marth64 <marth64@proxyid.net> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Marth64 <marth64@proxyid.net>
> ---
>  doc/filters.texi | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/filters.texi b/doc/filters.texi
> index f4084ff494..eff2256fef 100644
> --- a/doc/filters.texi
> +++ b/doc/filters.texi
> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ filtergraph, a link between the corresponding input
> and output pad is
>  created.
>
>  If an output pad is not labelled, it is linked by default to the first
> -unlabelled input pad of the next filter in the filterchain.
> +unlabeled input pad of the next filter in the filterchain.
>  For example in the filterchain
>  @example
>  nullsrc, split[L1], [L2]overlay, nullsink
> @@ -204,13 +204,13 @@ the split filter instance has two output pads, and
> the overlay filter
>  instance two input pads. The first output pad of split is labelled
>  "L1", the first input pad of overlay is labelled "L2", and the second
>  output pad of split is linked to the second input pad of overlay,
> -which are both unlabelled.
> +which are both unlabeled.
>
>  In a filter description, if the input label of the first filter is not
>  specified, "in" is assumed; if the output label of the last filter is not
>  specified, "out" is assumed.
>
> -In a complete filterchain all the unlabelled filter input and output
> +In a complete filterchain all the unlabeled filter input and output
>  pads must be connected. A filtergraph is considered valid if all the
>  filter input and output pads of all the filterchains are connected.
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".