From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05A684CDF3 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 22:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894D968BB78; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:02:02 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail-pj1-f46.google.com (mail-pj1-f46.google.com [209.85.216.46]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94D1468A9C0 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:01:55 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail-pj1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2ee50ffcf14so7527388a91.0 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 14:01:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1737928913; x=1738533713; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ylU4BLVHvlLswrgt7sUeWlCie+Mn9fUawJ5xnpv6FSc=; b=O/21WzloeYcoOCDd35F69o/8/ARfQhNnZ+Axa3pIzzWytEhS1jkIpwPryhNcNcfB1V DDbUjMzl8oytwQ0ahva3jxpM2wtu24QI6XHRXN+RR+czEuc3LexfAhDXI/Vd/Wg/b+AY u1ELOYSjDFEmMY/RZbe7uRRX76NsXLPbLifVeYy8ws0lNX+A1ryCvwWTw453yOU62YmS EVPvW5uBepEYa3vedFs25YHRfIXAxbGxJ+Bv9aJsiNdvu2X9ZROrQ2VvDTQpp9lxFiZC qOHbErvy1iOw2x5jWdktSX22ZCSPF/6uujwBg29WQdtOG3QRRh4sT3K6R/amESBIM5Pm oVOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzTzUv4iObB++Kq72xAiiqgqPErv33aokc89VnWFl+JRMXUXgcA 7DDYB2kGW6Yukl78f6lCzTA7/ZAFTnzQSKnf5o0L8rBQVtXepKchS3YM0qDFxKoyNpb5NC7sT78 3R/wScr9Audrmf9vw9TXDC/zqz2aDRRycoA6rhQ+Hdik0u7/zl4s= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuA8m4BWyAtD7HbtjUYOc10eUIS8X7ls4PJ/PJth0iK4nps9zciWDIv35FpO+9 LeT54BjwoeyJdVH44LpsGREHPowhpY0kINe4G4pvvPheFQSwcgu5QEGqEChTuLbU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGouBZJkaVS6Rb7bjT3fXb1nrt4n5tymYol3pQAleRluQDXcB10exeStiKqT8V6F0XG8IdtLdbfe6MdmDCeY0E= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:2747:b0:2ef:7be8:e987 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2f7ff3581a8mr16492052a91.12.1737928913483; Sun, 26 Jan 2025 14:01:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250102141731.GR4991@pb2> <20250126191713.GQ4991@pb2> <2572295.Sgy9Pd6rRy@basile.remlab.net> In-Reply-To: From: Marth64 Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 16:01:17 -0600 X-Gm-Features: AWEUYZlmmF_JednnHY_qUGx9CBuzgI-XOoDBsqIPo2himWdraFv5cC6LbLu3FsY Message-ID: To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Hi, That is what I am imagining when I mean have a meeting, suggesting that maybe we should try a different communication medium that can be facilitated more rapidly. I was thinking an IRC meeting would be more beneficial than email because email is hard to moderate. In IRC, there are more easily applicable tools to use for managing tricky conversations. For example, a meeting can start with everyone having voice +v mode (and channel with +m mode) and we can set boundaries to say "please don't do XYZ". Then, if someone impulsively breaks the rule, a set of chosen level headed moderator(s) can revoke the offending user's voice for 5 mins, 10 mins, permanently based on severity, etc. These moderators do not have to be CC. All of their mode set actions are public and logged in the same channel which is convenient. Agenda can be in phases. Not one meeting would solve all problems. But in this way I am thinking we can encapsulate and redirect tough conversations to real time discussion and maybe make more progress one small item at a time. I see it this way (hypothetical as an example), (1) Weekly email threads about problems -> chain emails that take mental bandwidth every day to get through -> 1-2 hours lost daily (2) Scheduled meeting cadence for people to vent, discuss concerns -> 1 concentrated hour every 2 weeks With (2) people can have time to buffer and better articulate thoughts in between meetings, and if moderated on IRC impulsive behavior can be addressed right away. It also gives a chance to set agendas. For example if one person has a proposal we can block out time for it and dedicate it to questions/answers. I am sorry some of these problems are out of scope for me but I am just trying to suggest different ways to handle conflict resolution that might yield results. Thank you _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".