From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE5B54CE0F for ; Wed, 28 May 2025 17:34:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91EC468D138; Wed, 28 May 2025 20:34:37 +0300 (EEST) Received: from 8.mo575.mail-out.ovh.net (8.mo575.mail-out.ovh.net [46.105.74.219]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 085E368D138 for ; Wed, 28 May 2025 20:34:31 +0300 (EEST) Received: from director11.ghost.mail-out.ovh.net (unknown [10.108.9.77]) by mo575.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4b6xT22G70z1qvY for ; Wed, 28 May 2025 17:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ghost-submission-5b5ff79f4f-v694h (unknown [10.110.178.91]) by director11.ghost.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9CE0C5BA1 for ; Wed, 28 May 2025 17:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from courmont.net ([37.59.142.96]) by ghost-submission-5b5ff79f4f-v694h with ESMTPSA id ttBlJyVJN2jbUQEAR+qujg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 28 May 2025 17:34:29 +0000 Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-96R0016f6c5f3d-470d-4b46-9c4d-7eb1bd1e0581, 7A384A35224C97E7BDA57F496065E5D5C5D5A513) smtp.auth=postmaster@courmont.net X-OVh-ClientIp: 176.93.156.36 Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 20:34:27 +0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Denis-Courmont?= To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 5270900414319827449 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddtgddvfeekjeculddtuddrgeefvddrtddtmdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvufgfjghfkfggtgfgsehtqhhmtddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpeftrohmihcuffgvnhhishdqvehouhhrmhhonhhtuceorhgvmhhisehrvghmlhgrsgdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgfeulefhfeffgeevgeetgeeuheeguddvffeltdejgeetuddvtdejhffhgeetvdejnecukfhppeduvdejrddtrddtrddupddujeeirdelfedrudehiedrfeeipdefjedrheelrddugedvrdelieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeduvdejrddtrddtrddupdhmrghilhhfrhhomheprhgvmhhisehrvghmlhgrsgdrnhgvthdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddprhgtphhtthhopehffhhmphgvghdquggvvhgvlhesfhhfmhhpvghgrdhorhhgpdfovfetjfhoshhtpehmohehjeehmgdpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhht Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] The "bad" Patch X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Hi, Whatever glibc does or doesn't do is kinda irrelevant. FFmpeg is supposed to be portable and that makes `system()` a non-starter given how bad it *can* be. With that said, and with my CC hat on, if you would consider a portably safer alternative, I can only say that considering what strong objections there were, and who made them, the only way forward (if any) is to solicit the TC. (I am not necessarily against spawn/fork+exec but I am also *not* a TC member.) Br, _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".