Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] doc/developer: Code pushed without patches on ffmpeg-devel must be announced on the ML

[Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>]

Michael Niedermayer:
> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
> ---
>  doc/developer.texi | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/developer.texi b/doc/developer.texi
> index 383120daaa..1c0091fc74 100644
> --- a/doc/developer.texi
> +++ b/doc/developer.texi
> @@ -856,6 +856,15 @@ way to get everyone's patches reviewed sooner.
>  Reviews must be constructive and when rejecting a patch the reviewer must explain
>  their reasons and ideally suggest an alternative approach.
>  
> +If a change is pushed without being sent to ffmpeg-devel, the developer
> +pushing it must annouce doing so on the ffmpeg-devel mailing list immedeatly.
> +@example
> +forgot a semicolon in this patch, pushed a seperate fix
> +pushed my new autograd engine and stable diffusion filter. Didnt want to
> +go through the bikeshed if that belongs in FFmpeg, go to the GA if you want
> +it removed. Otherwise Just tell me what i should improve and ill look into it.
> +@end example

This encourages pushing patches (even completely new filters) without
sending them to the ML.

- Andreas

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".