From: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC]x264 avcc and related issue
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 18:58:24 +0100
Message-ID: <AS8P250MB0744C0EB681E0A641B5E0AA48F222@AS8P250MB0744.EURP250.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_BC9ADB40559A949F4DAB7C4E5270222D4A08@qq.com>
Zhao Zhili:
> There are multiple encoders which can output bitstream in avcc/hvcc format,
> e.g, x264, x265 and videotoolbox. This can improve performance depends on
> container format (no more ff_avc_parse_nal_units_buf).
>
> The problem is these encoders output parameter sets directly, not contained
> in a complete AVC/HEVC configuration box. But muxers only expect
> extradata in
> annexb format, or a complete AVC/HEVC configuration box, not support such
> length+sps+length+pps format. The following command will output a broken
> file:
>
> ./ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -an -c:v libx264 -x264-params annexb=0 broken.mp4
>
> I want to fix this issue and improve the performance at the same time.
>
> There are multiple options that I don't know how to make a choice.
>
> 1. At the muxer level? It's easy and ugly. And there are corner case
> like 00 00 01 xx can be start code of annexb and size of avcc at the
> same time.
>
> 2. A new bsf? It looks less useful outside of libavcodec. And encoder
> can't enable a bsf automatically.
>
> 3. A specific helper like h26x_vcc.h? Can it be more general?
>
> Any more suggestions?
>
If we support a new packetization (even if it only affects extradata),
we would need to support it everywhere -- decoders and muxers, too. I
don't see an advantage or a need for a new packetization, as AFAIK all
containers with ISOBMFF packetization also use the ISOMBFF configuration
box. So I am against 1. and 2.
Implementing this inside lavc seems like the best approach; I don't know
whether a common helper for this will be useful: While these lists
certainly have a common pattern, there are subtle changes between them
which will probably make a common helper unsuitable.
- Andreas
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-05 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-05 17:34 Zhao Zhili
2024-03-05 17:58 ` Andreas Rheinhardt [this message]
2024-03-05 18:13 ` Zhao Zhili
2024-03-05 18:15 ` Andreas Rheinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AS8P250MB0744C0EB681E0A641B5E0AA48F222@AS8P250MB0744.EURP250.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
--to=andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com \
--cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:
git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
public-inbox-index ffmpegdev
Example config snippet for mirrors.
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git