Hi , my team recently had to abandon switching to using FFmpeg from specific decoder implementations (NvDEC, Intel Media SDK , IPP and quite a few codec specific decoders) because of big performance issues because of the way FFmpeg works….. or at least we think it is (we’re FFmpeg noobs 😃 ) It's actually an issue we also had with Intel Media SDK, leading us to pay Intel to extend Media SDK to do what we needed. Our product is a video surveillance system, and that means we have to decode a LOT of video streams simultaneously. For motion detection we want to only decode keyframes, and skip P and B frames , and that works fine with FFmpeg most of the time, except for when the video stream contains B frames. Without B-Frames it’s really simple (simplified pseudocode) : while(true) { receiveStreamCompleteFrame(); If(KeyFrame) { avcodec_send_packet(); if(avcodec_receive_frame()==0) { // do motion detection } } } But! with B Frames FFmpeg doesn’t return keyframes when they are decoded, they are kept, and we can’t seem to flush them out. avcodec_flush_buffers allow us to continue to next keyframe, but it doesn’t seem to give us the keyframe we just gave to FFmpeg with avcodec_send_packet. while(true) { receiveStreamCompleteFrame(); If(KeyFrame) { avcodec_send_packet(); if(avcodec_receive_frame()==0) { // do motion detection } Else { avcodec_flush_buffers(); if(avcodec_receive_frame()==0) { // do motion detection } } } } Calling avcodec_receive_frame after calling avcodec_flush_buffer results in -11 and no frame is there anyway around this ? And if not, could FFmpeg be made to have this functionality ? I tried contacting one of the FFmpeg consultants from https://ffmpeg.org/consulting.html but never got a response Michael Bodenhoff Principal Software Engineer FT01 Email: mibo@milestone.dk [Linkedin Logo][Twitter Logo][Youtube Logo][Facebook Logo][Instagram Logo] [Milestone Logo]