Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avformat/movenc: initialize pts/dts/duration of timecode packet
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:16:09 +0100
Message-ID: <AM7PR03MB6660B6AD0EAD8117A57737368F0C9@AM7PR03MB6660.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220311155851.GA9443@gmail.com>

lance.lmwang@gmail.com:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 03:04:32PM +0100, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>> lance.lmwang@gmail.com:
>>> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 09:58:31PM +0800, lance.lmwang@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> From: Limin Wang <lance.lmwang@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Fix below error message when timecode packet is written.
>>>> "Application provided duration: -9223372036854775808 / timestamp: -9223372036854775808 is out of range for mov/mp4 format"
>>>>
>>>> try to reproduce by:
>>>> ffmpeg -y -f lavfi -i color -metadata "timecode=00:00:00:00" -t 1 test.mov
>>>>
>>>> Note although error message is printed, the timecode packet will be written anyway. So
>>>> the patch 2/2 will try to change the log level to warning.
>>>>
>>>> The first two test case of fate-lavf-ismv have timecode setting, so the crc of ref data is different.
>>>> Fixes ticket #9488
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Limin Wang <lance.lmwang@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  libavformat/movenc.c | 2 ++
>>>>  tests/ref/lavf/ismv  | 4 ++--
>>>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/libavformat/movenc.c b/libavformat/movenc.c
>>>> index 4c86891..74b94cd 100644
>>>> --- a/libavformat/movenc.c
>>>> +++ b/libavformat/movenc.c
>>>> @@ -6383,6 +6383,8 @@ static int mov_create_timecode_track(AVFormatContext *s, int index, int src_inde
>>>>      pkt->data = data;
>>>>      pkt->stream_index = index;
>>>>      pkt->flags = AV_PKT_FLAG_KEY;
>>>> +    pkt->pts = pkt->dts = av_rescale_q(tc.start, av_inv_q(rate), (AVRational){1,mov->movie_timescale});
>>>> +    pkt->duration = av_rescale_q(1, av_inv_q(rate), (AVRational){1,mov->movie_timescale});
>>>>      pkt->size = 4;
>>>>      AV_WB32(pkt->data, tc.start);
>>>>      ret = ff_mov_write_packet(s, pkt);
>>>> diff --git a/tests/ref/lavf/ismv b/tests/ref/lavf/ismv
>>>> index ac7f72b..723b432 100644
>>>> --- a/tests/ref/lavf/ismv
>>>> +++ b/tests/ref/lavf/ismv
>>>> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>>>> -48fb8d7a5d19bd60f3a49ccf4b7d6593 *tests/data/lavf/lavf.ismv
>>>> +7a24b73c096ec0f13f0f7a2d9101c4c1 *tests/data/lavf/lavf.ismv
>>>>  313169 tests/data/lavf/lavf.ismv
>>>>  tests/data/lavf/lavf.ismv CRC=0x9d9a638a
>>>> -d19cd8e310a2e94fe0a0d11c5dc29217 *tests/data/lavf/lavf.ismv
>>>> +79646383fd099d45ad0d0c2791c601dd *tests/data/lavf/lavf.ismv
>>>>  322075 tests/data/lavf/lavf.ismv
>>>>  tests/data/lavf/lavf.ismv CRC=0xe8130120
>>>>  3b6023766845b51b075aed474c00f73c *tests/data/lavf/lavf.ismv
>>>> -- 
>>>> 1.8.3.1
>>>>
>>>
>>> will apply the patch set tomorrow unless there are any objections.
>>>
>>
>> You have not really answered whether the current files or the new files
>> are spec-incompliant; you have just reported that one byte is different.
> 
> Sorry, I think I have said both current and new file is spec-compliant in the last
> email. 
> 

You stated that you think that both files are valid, but you also said
that you don't even know what this byte that is different actually means.

> By Quicktime file format specs:
> Section Timecode Sample Description, all tmcd field isn't used pts/dts.
> 
> As for where is the different for one byte, it's caused by pkt->duration. The
> old is 0(uninitialized), after the patch it's 33(1 frame duration).  
> 

The text about Timecode Sample Description reads as follows: "Frame
duration: A 32-bit integer that indicates how long each frame lasts in
real time." This implies that only one of the two files can be
spec-compliant. I am not a mov/ISOBMFF expert, but it seems to me that
the current way of doing things is wrong. But I wonder about whether
your patch is correct for vfr content. Doesn't the property of being vfr
need to be reflected in the timecodes somehow (with different durations
for different packets)?

- Andreas
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-11 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-02 13:58 lance.lmwang
2022-03-02 13:58 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] avformat/movenc: use warning log level and small adjustment for the log lance.lmwang
2022-03-03  1:55 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avformat/movenc: initialize pts/dts/duration of timecode packet Andreas Rheinhardt
2022-03-03  4:57   ` lance.lmwang
2022-03-11 13:58 ` lance.lmwang
2022-03-11 14:04   ` Andreas Rheinhardt
2022-03-11 15:58     ` lance.lmwang
2022-03-11 16:16       ` Andreas Rheinhardt [this message]
2022-03-12  0:07         ` lance.lmwang
2022-03-22 12:37         ` lance.lmwang
2022-03-22 13:28           ` Andreas Rheinhardt
2022-03-22 14:32             ` lance.lmwang
2022-03-14 15:36 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] avformat/movenc: initialize pts/dts " lance.lmwang
2022-03-14 15:36   ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] avformat/movenc: use warning log level and small adjustment for the log lance.lmwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AM7PR03MB6660B6AD0EAD8117A57737368F0C9@AM7PR03MB6660.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com \
    --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
		ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
	public-inbox-index ffmpegdev

Example config snippet for mirrors.


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git