From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C154266F for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 11:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9132868B2A4; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 14:52:08 +0300 (EEST) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2962D68AE99 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 14:52:02 +0300 (EEST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37913200E86 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:51:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap49 ([10.202.2.99]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:51:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1650887518; x= 1650973918; bh=EigHrlTti4dWxp6FJ3BcV6UAEzfhX6zwOTSdFRhiLLI=; b=J HCGpmL4RoGXI998wb5c77SFw4/T/RelIo2pGk21HOcN2Zix1ifPPrldx6ENHVBPg 2Vx7bCvX5SCF787ppgYHigBYDcTykSLZbyx3ux5J1QQe986lMYHKI+qQHJoziovV q3KMYy5U3uaGGzn2r/a8zYDQf60k3qAFMZEeqIdyd8Dmi7RbNABJBuSbBn969+J9 pYLs5/KzVHofvyw/rHXuZytL/w7AeHWFSLytu95ljL1F/Jd8b5Loqrn6UJ0QKPGA m5th/Lt3r1qdwAJy5yjOBty2WQblXHie0E7ntTdkBaPBeFlz5/IF8n8o0bwbsPdG KP24L9gvuJgUyNC0+P6rg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedruddugdegvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtre dtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdflvggrnhdquegrphhtihhsthgvucfmvghmphhffdcuoehj sgesvhhiuggvohhlrghnrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeiiefgvdffteekke ffvdeiffeijeethfevteeutdegvdegfeekgfektdelheefgfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhi iigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjsgesvhhiuggvohhlrghnrdhorh hg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id BFE8615A0069; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:51:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-569-g7622ad95cc-fm-20220421.002-g7622ad95 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <9c39d56f-9cf0-4f81-9e13-4bc1034cac3b@beta.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20220423163611.GX2829255@pb2> References: <20220423163611.GX2829255@pb2> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 13:51:26 +0200 From: "Jean-Baptiste Kempf" To: ffmpeg-devel Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.0 LTS vs 5.1 LTS X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, at 18:36, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ? > Or something else ? My understanding of the consensus was; - 5.0 in Dec/Jan - 5.1 in Jul with API additions, but no ABI/behavior breakage - 6.0 in Dec 22 with ABI/API/behavior breakage and while 5.1 becomes LTS - 6.1 in Jul 23... -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President +33 672 704 734 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".