From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AB7449AB for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2023 12:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9008668BA50; Wed, 5 Apr 2023 15:55:26 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [85.30.129.176]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 381F368B81D for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2023 15:55:20 +0300 (EEST) Received: from debian.lan (h-79-136-39-105.A258.priv.bahnhof.se [79.136.39.105]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B23971FD9F for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2023 14:55:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <9a1537bcf40f2673e722a166d0b677b75efad8f6.camel@haerdin.se> From: Tomas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=E4rdin?= To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2023 14:55:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20230330231441.8868-3-michael@niedermayer.cc> References: <20230330231441.8868-1-michael@niedermayer.cc> <20230330231441.8868-3-michael@niedermayer.cc> User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1+deb11u1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/3] [RFC] Remove libopenjpegenc X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: fre 2023-03-31 klockan 01:14 +0200 skrev Michael Niedermayer: > FFmpeg has its own jpeg2000 encoder > This avoids a dependency > > This is not ready yet as we still miss xyz / ya pixel formats, and > some cinama stuff, but > it seems this should be the direction to aim at. And it seems there > is not much missing If we can reach feature parity then this sounds OK. In retrospect maybe I should have worked on improving libopenjpeg performance instead. Oh well. We need the HT stuff in, and also my threading patchset rebased and pushed as well. Else we'll have worse performance than opj. With my patchset, and a bit of work on Caleb and pal's patchset, then we might be able to bring j2k performance (both part1 and ht) far above opj There may be some other details as well regarding features of j2kdec vs opj but I forget /Tomas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".