From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4AC445737 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 11:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F23E68C27F; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 13:15:17 +0200 (EET) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 247A768C20A for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 13:15:11 +0200 (EET) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A1F32007E8 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 07:15:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 23 Mar 2023 07:15:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=itanimul.li; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1679570107; x=1679656507; bh=N6nwjatUbZTZZZjNnPqkQZdSCv7TjF20afj YY+rtKxQ=; b=WwJbmAXWz3TV6Ulm+P155izKLa8fZ9aI9QrNMPNLSQBTwWuJAsJ CdetXyGFNg6hcTl4GWDtUJJDntoqRByHbyJ2kasynZ932hsdwZtZz+arHyQhDgMZ b8h8KHMWNUz0Kg11zUHgwq7cOhl6kZ/hW/dwe7PZ/OgF9K2hjV55klCWMgVOl400 ON4ej0cHqbnaJKICpSn6yFxO+QITGXM+NCgqz9Sw1VFD7X8VtNTShPC9nDItukjm +DNQ9I2zbENo+QjcBpD3QMHrh+FrGqZ83sZCCNbFBwxvLEC+n2GhlAuxGEuu7f4w fbFtr3ZILR5sLWpren2aOJlpfmbXkHqdidA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1679570107; x= 1679656507; bh=N6nwjatUbZTZZZjNnPqkQZdSCv7TjF20afjYY+rtKxQ=; b=t pzxOCfwEO/yVOTJ6DBkEnZT7HFjCiZ4xuEHfd6X+6k/VTpXlf6Czs3cMXn2bF4rO y8SGSHrHHFy89rPTC6cYojLopCIm6ySQ5Z80uTdFOs6cS9V0ImubdXrCFMmaj/VI y9DGjYtTXByEhEEF7R+lBHefGojmmMUu7NedtLY4ST3n4Hbj/FpxutV0uUR6Ikha 4JS29UMiOSHjFX6a2bA1OTKu/WhusOADhRjKi/biVcRcBQvO5tMD8HKyIdK+3YML JSijO5RPSlyCFzBqc4NGrtD0iyclMxJbvm2ohoeMBo8YHHPEvufY2fSm9qzDpOFk gXEtKp2VZBg+difqD7VRg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdeggedgvdehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffoffkjghfgggtgfesthhqmhdtredttdenucfhrhhomhepfdflrdcu ffgvkhhkvghrfdcuoehjuggvkhesihhtrghnihhmuhhlrdhliheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepueeuheevheehleffheekteeikeehgfeggeektefgfeekffffvefghedvudehteek necuffhomhgrihhnpedtgidurdhsthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrh grmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjuggvkhesihhtrghnihhmuhhlrdhlih X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i84994747:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 07:15:06 -0400 (EDT) From: "J. Dekker" To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 12:15:04 +0100 X-Mailer: MailMate Trial (1.14r5937) Message-ID: <9FA8D55E-504A-40FA-9B8E-8E3514517A54@itanimul.li> In-Reply-To: <20230323100555.GM375355@pb2> References: <20230323091829.34057-1-jdek@itanimul.li> <20230323100555.GM375355@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/er: remove check for fields X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 23 Mar 2023, at 11:05, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:18:29AM +0100, J. Dekker wrote: >> This change on its own is almost certainly not correct; however, in >> testing many samples show notable improvement. >> --- > > do you plan to implement support for field based error concealment ? > field based content was rare in what i watched when i wrote this so > i didnt bother originally implementing it IIRC I can send you interlaced samples if you would like. I had planned on doing improvements for field/mbaff error concealment myself in the future. There still seems to be a lot of field based content in the wild whilst it is being phased out. Here's the comparison of the change above: https://0x1.st/f0.mp4 https://0x1.st/fe.mp4 https://0x1.st/fZ.mp4 https://0x1.st/fv.mp4 -- J. Dekker _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".