From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1349C46F02 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 06:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D299268D143; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:50:45 +0200 (EET) Received: from mout-p-103.mailbox.org (mout-p-103.mailbox.org [80.241.56.161]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24D6768CF61 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:50:40 +0200 (EET) Received: from smtp202.mailbox.org (smtp202.mailbox.org [10.196.197.202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-103.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TgP0r5yKgz9scY for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:50:36 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <99bb2fa4-9dc1-4ceb-b2c3-c68c4ea2bd6e@gyani.pro> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 12:20:36 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org References: <170841737762.27417.14992162535824834057@lain.khirnov.net> <170841903359.27417.409422117260058401@lain.khirnov.net> <903b92fd-f1b5-42ee-81f4-04136b3b526f@gyani.pro> <170842737298.27417.5283452340136231344@lain.khirnov.net> From: Gyan Doshi In-Reply-To: <170842737298.27417.5283452340136231344@lain.khirnov.net> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] clarifying the TC conflict of interest rule X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 2024-02-20 04:39 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote: > As for determining conflict of interest in case of dishonest TC > members, I don't think there is a general solution for it. This is not about dishonesty. Imagine a TC member genuinely does not self-assess or agree to a conflict of interest, does that mean they can vote regardless of what the other members think? In other words, by whom and how is a claim of conflict adjudicated? Regards, Gyan _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".