From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2EC49853 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:10:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F31F68D220; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 12:10:27 +0200 (EET) Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org (mout-p-201.mailbox.org [80.241.56.171]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D39D68C4EA for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 12:10:20 +0200 (EET) Received: from smtp202.mailbox.org (smtp202.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TfFKn42Tzz9srG for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:01:17 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <903b92fd-f1b5-42ee-81f4-04136b3b526f@gyani.pro> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 15:31:15 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org References: <170841737762.27417.14992162535824834057@lain.khirnov.net> <170841903359.27417.409422117260058401@lain.khirnov.net> Content-Language: en-US From: Gyan Doshi In-Reply-To: <170841903359.27417.409422117260058401@lain.khirnov.net> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4TfFKn42Tzz9srG X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] clarifying the TC conflict of interest rule X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 2024-02-20 02:20 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote: > So IMO the only case that needs to be excluded is 6) - an actual > conflict of interest. I therefore propose the following wording changes: > > --- a/doc/community.texi > +++ b/doc/community.texi > -If the disagreement involves a member of the TC, that member should recuse themselves from the decision. > > + Each TC member must vote on such decision according to what is, in their > + view, best for the project. If a TC member is affected by a conflict of > + interest with regards to the case, they must announce it and recuse > + themselves from the TC discussion and vote. A conflict of interest is > + presumed to occur when a TC member has a personal interest (e.g. > + financial) in a specific outcome of the case. 1) besides financial interest, what are some other types of 'personal interest in a specific outcome of the case'? 2) the proposed wording says, 'they must announce it and recuse themselves'. That makes it seem that if a member does not self-attest or admit to a conflict of interest, then they cannot be stopped from voting. To frame it as a question, what are the independent ways ( i.e. not including the said member) of making a conflict of interest determination? Regards, Gyan _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".