From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EB3407C1 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2FD68A927; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 15:53:15 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mout-p-102.mailbox.org (mout-p-102.mailbox.org [80.241.56.152]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 912A468A59A for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 15:53:07 +0300 (EEST) Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-102.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KVKpV6bhlz9sSY for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:53:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <84c8e30f-1f4b-6aac-6e54-f109cab09449@ycbcr.xyz> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:53:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org References: <0b54d7e7-d89b-606a-fbfe-67654d7f22d3@ycbcr.xyz> From: Steve Lhomme In-Reply-To: <0b54d7e7-d89b-606a-fbfe-67654d7f22d3@ycbcr.xyz> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Request For Comment no Matroska specs X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 2022-04-01 14:33, Steve Lhomme wrote: > Hi ffmmpeg developers, > > As you may know, we are working hard on the Matroska specifications at > the IETF. We already got EBML as an RFC [1]. We are in the process of > finalizing the main Matroska document. Before we submit the document for > formal review before "final" publishing, we would like people who know a > bit about Matroska to review the current draft in case there are parts > missing, hard to decipher or, even worse, bugs. > > This is a 200 pages document, so it may take a while. You can find draft > 09 at [2]. It should explain what is found in Matroska 1 to 4. Some > unused elements have been deprecated since the original informal > specifications. These elements can be found in Annex A. I forgot to mention you can reply here or on the GitHub repository of the specs [3] by creating an issue or even a Pull Request. [3] https://github.com/ietf-wg-cellar/matroska-specification > Thanks > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8794/ > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cellar-matroska/ > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".