Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCHv4 2/4] lavc/mpegvideo: use H263DSP dequant function

["Rémi Denis-Courmont" <remi@remlab.net>]

Le 11 juin 2024 13:37:57 GMT+03:00, Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com> a écrit :
>Rémi Denis-Courmont:
>> ---
>>  libavcodec/mpegvideo.c | 40 +++++++++-------------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/libavcodec/mpegvideo.c b/libavcodec/mpegvideo.c
>> index 7af823b8bd..810888fc47 100644
>> --- a/libavcodec/mpegvideo.c
>> +++ b/libavcodec/mpegvideo.c
>> @@ -201,13 +201,11 @@ static void dct_unquantize_mpeg2_inter_c(MpegEncContext *s,
>>  static void dct_unquantize_h263_intra_c(MpegEncContext *s,
>>                                    int16_t *block, int n, int qscale)
>>  {
>> -    int i, level, qmul, qadd;
>> -    int nCoeffs;
>> +    int qmul = qscale << 1;
>> +    int qadd, nCoeffs;
>>  
>>      av_assert2(s->block_last_index[n]>=0 || s->h263_aic);
>>  
>> -    qmul = qscale << 1;
>> -
>>      if (!s->h263_aic) {
>>          block[0] *= n < 4 ? s->y_dc_scale : s->c_dc_scale;
>>          qadd = (qscale - 1) | 1;
>> @@ -219,43 +217,20 @@ static void dct_unquantize_h263_intra_c(MpegEncContext *s,
>>      else
>>          nCoeffs= s->intra_scantable.raster_end[ s->block_last_index[n] ];
>>  
>> -    for(i=1; i<=nCoeffs; i++) {
>> -        level = block[i];
>> -        if (level) {
>> -            if (level < 0) {
>> -                level = level * qmul - qadd;
>> -            } else {
>> -                level = level * qmul + qadd;
>> -            }
>> -            block[i] = level;
>> -        }
>> -    }
>> +    s->h263dsp.h263_dct_unquantize_intra(block, nCoeffs, qmul, qadd);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void dct_unquantize_h263_inter_c(MpegEncContext *s,
>>                                    int16_t *block, int n, int qscale)
>>  {
>> -    int i, level, qmul, qadd;
>> +    int qmul = qscale << 1;
>> +    int qadd = (qscale - 1) | 1;
>>      int nCoeffs;
>>  
>>      av_assert2(s->block_last_index[n]>=0);
>>  
>> -    qadd = (qscale - 1) | 1;
>> -    qmul = qscale << 1;
>> -
>>      nCoeffs= s->inter_scantable.raster_end[ s->block_last_index[n] ];
>> -
>> -    for(i=0; i<=nCoeffs; i++) {
>> -        level = block[i];
>> -        if (level) {
>> -            if (level < 0) {
>> -                level = level * qmul - qadd;
>> -            } else {
>> -                level = level * qmul + qadd;
>> -            }
>> -            block[i] = level;
>> -        }
>> -    }
>> +    s->h263dsp.h263_dct_unquantize_inter(block, nCoeffs, qmul, qadd);
>
>What is the cost of these function calls?

The same as any other indirect function tail call. What do you want me to say?! Changing how FFmpeg handles assembler optimisations, or removing the upper level of indirection is outside the scope of this MR (and not very realistic).

For that matter, there are hundreds of indirect calls that could be optimised out on some platforms, notably almost all Armv8 NEON functions and, on x86-64, all MMX or SSE2 exclusives. I don't get nitpicking this one.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".