From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D885743F8C for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 12:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B355968BDA5; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 14:29:49 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail-oi1-f176.google.com (mail-oi1-f176.google.com [209.85.167.176]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89A3D68BA9D for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 14:29:43 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail-oi1-f176.google.com with SMTP id i9so6414395oif.4 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 04:29:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=S1oDAhshJdThuZ4Yege3+691zUptzh6byEKDiFuM+9E=; b=G+6yrYT5RgEw10vI/f4Wajvfy/eClrXC9yefwghVBIyCBN+8kdwuR4DdCHe3RboxNV ClWoIM0zMd48StzOS8Ri7YG8gRhG80Oc2QDRlOZiC9YQVjcw38BgeXBZk+17l1zalnkQ jPwCR+B/OorqIDqxVwebUFOr5H+1yOar3uxsPA1vy1jL0f5ylrJU3FdylSoKOgg4+s2V /c9zQhPKhGszbFU47QLp/jFbC1Id1sdydMC7oheENIwFX4KcnYdWrWfZsCzcute7DhwK KHZmNILUwR0uSbRV10tD63ZPLYUhNRMZGInigFJMHKWKQgFSvToEgCwaxcxBkUVwGlgm AwvA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=S1oDAhshJdThuZ4Yege3+691zUptzh6byEKDiFuM+9E=; b=EDydo+u9lPybFNdMtT3lng2D5fk7bvXUWeuhXBFSx924qvJQhHGNQcUgiS0ssD4vIS 98tbpHeVI4Ws6otapHpwj3eRTh7kelCU3UUf4oJPjwKDSHv89XfysCMyrvGqV9/jZBCb IVfDYr2R2swPpl33ZAINefl4jS4KXDnLT2nWKRsMJRoighp1RsGqUFb2Tg26VDj8XyZk ocHbhxxRNbtPZdDz2x7Y5akXUZbdJEuq5LQk/PzV5WlZhJNo8/bBwPRyzf6QCXncPddG 1W+PZy9Ws8rfEEeCNT0ZyM1l4cemcOYH2OGXJgP5pB24BnSQB8/isW1NIyf6YIdFtmBG t4zQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2koXKdsyfWLNVPG738UGILdWfMf/7EEbKbySlbSKB5+BmRoIuljn +Xp5Z+dJ5EqaNlathptESzlyQ663nyo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsE7S+UkeHTtoW0hj2NzuMIdGHrU7WNSDiCBUZtTU06DQ+A+Ey4EaPmpj6A4lp/W9U1z+ULdw== X-Received: by 2002:aca:6205:0:b0:365:648:3a5d with SMTP id w5-20020aca6205000000b0036506483a5dmr11789022oib.42.1674476981538; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 04:29:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.14] (host197.190-225-105.telecom.net.ar. [190.225.105.197]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w11-20020a0568080d4b00b0035c422bb303sm22825359oik.19.2023.01.23.04.29.40 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Jan 2023 04:29:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <83e1f15b-8c1c-562a-681a-41adaca3c2a3@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 09:29:39 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org References: <20230120193132.21597-1-anton@khirnov.net> <20230120193132.21597-4-anton@khirnov.net> <22d25e3f-91e2-408d-a0a9-bef8ad3a0248@betaapp.fastmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: James Almer In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 4/5] lavfi/graphparser: reimplement avfilter_graph_parse* using new API X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 1/20/2023 6:39 PM, Nicolas George wrote: > Nicolas George (12023-01-20): >> - Writing a large patch for a part of the code you know well or for a >> new feature is fine, of course. > > In fact, even for code we know well, we should consult, as long as we > are not the only one who knows it well: as long as other developers > might also have plans that we would be interfering with, sharing intents > early is the only correct thing to do towards our peers. Nobody is disrespecting you for writing a big patch that implements or rewrites some API from a part of the code you consider yourself knowledgeable about without consulting you personally beforehand. He in fact sent a Request for Comment initial set precisely because he wanted input on the overall approach before sending a version that's ready for a proper review. What's the difference between a RFC and a "I have this idea, what do you think of this mock up?" email? That if suggestions are made to improve or change said approach, then at worst what happens is that the writer wasted /his/ time writing 30k lines of which a fifth might need to be redone. In all cases, you lost nothing, and the author at worst lost time. I have no idea how you come to the conclusion that you were disrespected, or not considered a peer. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".