From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3F534CE33 for ; Wed, 28 May 2025 18:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF12868D9D6; Wed, 28 May 2025 21:30:51 +0300 (EEST) Received: from iq.passwd.hu (iq.passwd.hu [217.27.212.140]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F339668CC4A for ; Wed, 28 May 2025 21:30:45 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by iq.passwd.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB970E8780 for ; Wed, 28 May 2025 20:27:36 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at passwd.hu Received: from iq.passwd.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (iq.passwd.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jrldhhMYTnvf for ; Wed, 28 May 2025 20:27:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from iq (iq [217.27.212.140]) by iq.passwd.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9023BE8764 for ; Wed, 28 May 2025 20:27:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 20:27:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Marton Balint To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <7cf41625-8f77-51ec-a18f-b20c893a3ecf@passwd.hu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] The "bad" Patch X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Wed, 28 May 2025, softworkz . wrote: > Please note: > > I have no intentions towards getting this merged. > > It's a valid opinion when you think that "ffmpeg shouldn't > launch a browser" or similar - but that's not the topic. > This is merely a technical question. "ffmpeg should not launch a browser" or "this feature is out of scope for the ffmpeg" has technical aspects too, like we do not want to increase maintenance burden with features which can be done easily with basic scripting. Regards, Marton _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".