Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

[James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>]

On 4/18/2024 4:50 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:22:09AM +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote:
>> On 18/04/2024 10:13, epirat07@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On 18 Apr 2024, at 9:52, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>>>> On date Wednesday 2024-04-17 17:24:02 +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote:
>>>>> On 17/04/2024 14:58, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>> I've occasionally tried getting into ffmpeg for over a decade now, and have
>>>>> lurked here for the past few months as I put in the effort to grok it.
>>>>> On behalf of people who could contribute but don't, I'd like to suggest
>>>>> ffmpeg focus on *learnability*.
>>>>>
>> [...]
>>>>> But other issues seem like quick wins - for example I've lost count of
>>>>> all the times I typed two functions into Google, spent hours trying to
>>>>> make them work together, then finally realised I was looking at the
>>>>> documentation for 3.0 in one tab and 5.0 in the other.  Surely you can
>>>>> just add a line to the top of the documentation like "click here to see
>>>>> the trunk version of this file"?
>>>> Functions are documented in doxygen, so they depend on the major.minor
>>>> version, while you seem to refer to the FFmpeg version. Also on the
>>>> website we usually only have the latest mainline documentation, so I
>>>> don't understand how can you have different versions in different tabs
>>>> (unless you didn't update that tab since months/years).
>>> Thats not true and same things has happened to me multiple times,
>>> thats why I always have to check the URL to make sure the docs
>>> are the ones for master or latest release I am working with.
>>>
>>> For example see this ancient documentation here:
>>> https://ffmpeg.org/doxygen/1.2/index.html
>>
>> I'm glad I'm not the only one making that mistake!  In fact, older versions
>> don't just exist, they're often the first link in Google.  For example,
>> typing "avformat_init_output" into Google and clicking on the first link
>> takes me to [1] (version 3.2).
>>
>> The website doesn't have documentation for 6.1 or 7.0 ([2] and [3]),
> 
> the docs for master are generated by a cronjob
> the docs for releases are manually generated,
> thx for reminding me about it, ive generated the 6.1 and 7.0 ones now

I updated https://ffmpeg.org/documentation.html with links to them.

> 
> 
> [...]
>> Without getting too far off-topic, I would also be interested in knowing how
>> docs are actually generated in practice. I've tried generating documentation
> 
> its just running doxygen with a Doxyfile
> the Doxyfile is not  doc/Doxyfile from git because that could be a security
> issue. But its a very similar file
> 
> thx
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> 
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".