From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B884749A for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED3D68CA50; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 15:43:07 +0300 (EEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFA4468C5D0 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 15:43:01 +0300 (EEST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF1D5C01D6 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 08:43:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap49 ([10.202.2.99]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 10 Oct 2023 08:43:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1696941780; x=1697028180; bh=J0CghVST9iMKR 6G8YSX0yNdcsG7t+j5aQO8UirtE/IM=; b=Wdm8nK5I4ID/Dvhvjbg1VbBA5Mn1g 7Hp8a1cDLOJVB4n0GGLYcpG9sU1Y+t66jd3P0zhiBpIBTjg39Xr8opTV8LhcKk4n jTtkot5vdfkbD1ykRsUmYzfiOMqVSw74NKkGXcuuW4M723Mn02gcjOUMIrWTmy3E POiqKMtodXimXlVlywhqlCKM2rgRB7exVEhVm8wEzm1gOt+4oPQz8XWKoVFe3OiJ 8+Xi4QvCHrOPZrjcKrGzSP2kfVHfRsnS9xv3EMA4+ALkne1CDQ2P76ecfH1mVgZp TvdYkQlHit0diHTKIcKY42pkk+H//FddkjT3kq45ZVyG4jVujcJ+x3ImA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrheehgdehgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtre dtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdflvggrnhdquegrphhtihhsthgvucfmvghmphhffdcuoehj sgesvhhiuggvohhlrghnrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeettdfhkefftdeutd efieevieeggefgffdvjeeiiedvieetgedvgfejueehtdefffenucffohhmrghinhepghhi thhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepjhgssehvihguvgholhgrnhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i06904239:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1622F15A0091; Tue, 10 Oct 2023 08:42:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-958-g1b1b911df8-fm-20230927.002-g1b1b911d MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <7387796d-745b-422e-bf52-c90515e386f2@betaapp.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20231010115645.GE3543730@pb2> References: <20231010115645.GE3543730@pb2> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 14:42:38 +0200 From: "Jean-Baptiste Kempf" To: ffmpeg-devel Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] AG (GA?) VOTE X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Hello, On Tue, 10 Oct 2023, at 13:56, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > a vote on the General Assembly composition was apparently initiated with > a duration of 6 days, i saw this in my inbox: > "1009 23:49 Jean-Baptiste K (3,4K) Poll: FFmpeg AG members rules" > > There was no real prior discussion on the mailing list about this. https://github.com/videolabs/libspatialaudio > There are 2 choices which are similar > (update the list before each vote and update it twice a year) > And a 3rd option that is probably not what the "opposition" wants I think > (use the 2020 version, never update) Those 3 were mentioned at VDD in the FFmpeg meeting you were in. It was also already discussed at FOSDEM this year and the previous, and people complained that I did not do that vote before. > First its neccessary to give the community a chance to discuss the GA > composition > choices, collect suggestions and then do a vote I think this was done. > Now iam quite unprepared to really suggest something as i also didnt > think about this > much or expect this vote now but at least something like > * keep everyone who had vote rights but add active developers each > jan/july > > Is a more honest choice for the "opposition" than "never update" That's an extra choice, in my opinion, and we could also have it, but it's a bit annoying that you say it now. But it's doable. Best, -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President +33 672 704 734 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".