From: Paolo Prete <p4olo_prete-at-yahoo.it@ffmpeg.org>
To: FFmpeg Development Discussions and Patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] New API usage example (reading, converting, encoding and muxing an audio file)
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:59:05 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <712462429.460932.1654599545253@mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <165459496322.13099.10162954010675311855@lain>
What you say is true, IMHO, as long as the functions (in which the code is split) do really group logically related tasks and they have names that summarize what they are doing. In the examined case this is not true, see for example (in muxing.c):
static void open_video(AVFormatContext *oc, const AVCodec *codec, OutputStream *ost, AVDictionary *opt_arg)
The name "open_video" is too generic and it doesn't let the user know what the function is actually doing, without jumping from line to line in the code. In fact the function mixes different tasks: it opens the codec, it allocates a frame, it copies the stream parameters to the muxer. Same thing for write_audio_frame(), and in fact a comment is put just above the function, and it says:
"encode one audio frame and send it to the muxer,,,"
...which is obscure from the function's name (and, again, the user is forced to jump often from a chunk to another chunk of code in order to understand what the code is _generally_ doing).Note too that this can't be fixed by using more explicative or longer names, because the functions mixes tasks which are _different_.
Therefore, these functions in many cases do not improve readability and IMHO is better to have a longer code instead of forcing grouping different tasks in the same function with an ambiguous name.
Il martedì 7 giugno 2022, 11:42:23 CEST, Anton Khirnov <anton@khirnov.net> ha scritto:
Quoting Paolo Prete (2022-06-06 19:40:42)
> Hello,
> From what I see, the doc/examples files can be still improved. More
> precisely, their main() is often split into functions with short names
> that hide important (sometime essential) details of what they're doing
> and they worsen the readability, by forcing the user to jump from
> chunks to chunks of the code.
I disagree VERY strongly.
Long functions are extremely hard to reason about, because of all the
pieces you have to keep in your head at once. Grouping logically related
blocks of code into their own small functions that can be thought of as
a single unit immensely improves readability and maintainability.
--
Anton Khirnov
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-07 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <580594123.12475702.1654537242853.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
2022-06-06 17:40 ` Paolo Prete
2022-06-07 9:42 ` Anton Khirnov
2022-06-07 10:59 ` Paolo Prete [this message]
2022-06-07 11:56 ` Anton Khirnov
2022-06-07 12:37 ` Paolo Prete
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=712462429.460932.1654599545253@mail.yahoo.com \
--to=p4olo_prete-at-yahoo.it@ffmpeg.org \
--cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:
git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
public-inbox-index ffmpegdev
Example config snippet for mirrors.
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git