On 8/12/2025 7:04 PM, Marton Balint wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2025, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 at 23:38, Marton Balint <cus@passwd.hu> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Previously it was pretty clear from git history who actually committed
>>>    a change from the comitter field. With using forgejo the comitter
>>>    field no longer shows the person who actually *committed* the 
>>> change to
>>>    the main repo, but it is inherited from the original pull request 
>>> commit
>>>    instead, so it simply shows the original author of the patch.
>>
>> I don't think this is accurate. Committer field is set to the person
>> who clicks the "merge" button. Same as they would manually git push
>> the patches.
> 
> Even if the merge is fast forward? Because there is a pull request I 
> merged via forgejo, and committer was not updated:
> 09828e7fe214a28cacfb805605bd5b19041d1f68

It's the person who pushes the rebase-button.
If the merge is FF, rebase is skipped, and everything of the commit kept 
in tact, since the hash doesn't change.