From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BAD49D49 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 01:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B7B68CBED; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 03:37:02 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail-ed1-f49.google.com (mail-ed1-f49.google.com [209.85.208.49]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1307868C463 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 03:36:57 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail-ed1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5682ecd1f81so2345208a12.0 for ; Sat, 09 Mar 2024 17:36:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710034616; x=1710639416; darn=ffmpeg.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=+LOAU/LoGTdEtIz+NuhbkRcVmlERSA7gepXIAPyIR28=; b=kjuEGgP/FsK+vrA02WoitD7QVh+ZqFYloSRf9SLR7G7DY3VQPP8ReqDsWGq3jYh4YY 3HcYJDCPDZ45aFWG/jH2VN+o6LqBHHdkj1ppZTy2pDssKejDe501Oo7/zRwxKuXSofBT +ToDCDl3H9NRC6zvqncrX4RwuVHle2CO3tqg/JU+Ti1x/7kvXK/KvCDVBINJpfqJfzfk c6LaCXN36R0zy2K8ZpELXuMFkNbmbJuzyLMSjxE58aSU3JjQi8ogJEDV3iB+pWjd47ct 3odY+iT72JYe4D7YtHvYHOyPJjUb3wJ2fY/4kQJlugmDpUgsAPB2chLkQ/T/+JaqZHNn nlhg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710034616; x=1710639416; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+LOAU/LoGTdEtIz+NuhbkRcVmlERSA7gepXIAPyIR28=; b=UzhQoJO3uh5HnC33oDvrisD0Dx+cFKo76sIfnVvlDM6JvPID2gHcNciM30vkftONpo 9U2pNY2z/eAtsQOLWecER2C1G5osGVKdp7fwgIcDEz9pWh0rDU98w65D7rfeOAGK0Z9x pliF/lG+qbswg4TcFiKgidkou8FOIIxvg2/KBuNKgo7VYctCnqyhj2TY9KINmHGVscOA 7qcwUkBFZj7Jib9sv0qp3P3yCPY1H0iYKX9c+omgIUf41R7neoYW1SFWOK1sEMMnyTdC TyRCj95GauhMR1Rix08tGdWD3o2ByJLZI2bmT947aubj42im0+wC6UHCZYcWiwIWv6AT +3Kg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx6aoTFH69OFciJGk1kL8E4hFRkHGlL6ObieV0RhEbsEkkAaGv0 WAdfWv/7uaBQGcbkXvYjRjo/45mlZ+fZdUftpgrmBOLBRw2Y42R1FcIE/Fhx X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEBEADCyp5AHTJ+Kf5lwRGzW8lTIacnAPzaVFdjLLWoPaZJIbI1zb1HjRSElh5+mNDoDZlWLg== X-Received: by 2002:a50:cd1e:0:b0:568:2950:814b with SMTP id z30-20020a50cd1e000000b005682950814bmr2204692edi.28.1710034616233; Sat, 09 Mar 2024 17:36:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.178.30] (dynamic-2a01-0c23-64c7-5600-49b6-0f33-4aa5-ad40.c23.pool.telefonica.de. [2a01:c23:64c7:5600:49b6:f33:4aa5:ad40]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x25-20020aa7d6d9000000b005682aa466c0sm1440047edr.29.2024.03.09.17.36.54 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Mar 2024 17:36:55 -0800 (PST) From: epirat07@gmail.com To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 02:36:48 +0100 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r6022) Message-ID: <6CC987D1-4729-4430-B02D-0537D771B59B@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20240310012542.GA6401@pb2> References: <037.cb9821e3b48f657909b93eb043f05720@avcodec.org> <052.37b53673b298748e0746920ec1d4551d@avcodec.org> <6d595a68-14c8-4a22-b52b-a9ed98587d5c@gmail.com> <20240306125639.GU6401@pb2> <170996942472.7287.4678551313607358745@lain.khirnov.net> <8bbbc7fa-fe0f-4dd5-bc78-aae6106413d0@betaapp.fastmail.com> <20240310012542.GA6401@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Indefinite ban request [RFC] Was: Re: [FFmpeg-trac] #10882(undetermined:new): swscale wastefully scales luma during yuv420p -> yuv422p X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 10 Mar 2024, at 2:25, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi everyone > > Some members of the CC want to indefinitely ban Balling > from trac. And as our doc/community.texi says: > "Indefinite bans from the community must be confirmed by the General Assembly, in a majority vote." > > Thus some CC member wishes to involve the public here > (really theres no other option, the GA cannot discuss/vote on what it doesnt know) > > Also people have asked for more transparency and i strongly agree with transparency. > > As reference, and to make it possible for the community to discuss > this easily without too much google searching. Ive attached the > list of all changes in trac done by Balling. > > I do not and never did support permanently banning contributors. > > In summary: since 2019 > 842 comment0' changed > 389 comment1' changed > 176 comment2' changed > 87 comment3' changed > 49 comment4' changed > 24 comment5' changed > 12 comment6' changed > 6 comment7' changed > 4 comment8' changed > 3 comment9' changed > 2194 comment' changed > 10 component' changed > 12 description' changed > 29 keywords' changed > 37 owner' changed > 8 priority' changed > 7 reproduced' changed > 291 resolution' changed > 537 status' changed > 32 summary' changed > 2 type' changed > 11 version' changed > I already have an opinion about this topic due to various things I read from him on various OSS projects communication channels, but I am wondering how the attached document is helpful for the GA to get an idea of what this is about? Do you expect us to go through all of this list and visit each Trac ticket and look at what they wrote there? Maybe I am missing something here on the purpose of this document. > > On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 10:23:32PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> The CC has no authority for permanent bans >> "Indefinite bans from the community must be confirmed by the General Assembly, in a majority vote." >> >> I checked and it seems there are over 4800 events in trac from Balling, 3783 match the word "comment" >> since 2019 >> >> By what rules does the CC deal out warnings and bans ? >> >> I think this needs to be put in writing in the docs because >> currently its pretty much arbitrary. Some people get multiple >> warnings, some people get nothing, some people are suggested to be >> just banned with no prior warning > > > On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 11:06:39AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Sat, 9 Mar 2024, at 08:30, Anton Khirnov wrote: >>> Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-03-06 13:56:39) >>>> Balling does have a quite different style in his language. Not sure >>>> what is a good term, street style, ghetto style? >>>> >>>> He used the same style of language towards me 10 days ago: >>>> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/10824#comment:18 >>> >>> This is not a "style", he understands perfectly well what he is doing. >> >> Come on, the guy is a troll. >> We're not talking about a developer from FFmpeg, but an external troll, contributing nothing. >> Kick him out. > > -- > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB > > In fact, the RIAA has been known to suggest that students drop out > of college or go to community college in order to be able to afford > settlements. -- The RIAA > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".