Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [POLL] [VOTE] code.ffmpeg.org

[Timo Rothenpieler <timo@rothenpieler.org>]

On 7/13/2025 8:04 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> G, preferably hosted by videolan.

The main issue I have with Videolan Gitlab is the ultra locked down 
signup policy.
People appear in Videolan IRC multiple times a week asking to get their 
account activated, and only sometimes actually get help. Often they 
already waited multiple days.
It's an understandable anti-spam measure, but also extremely hostile to 
any potential contributor.

Also, Videolan Gitlab is very often, like at the moment of writing, 
EXTREMELY slow.
It just took it over a full minute to render the main page of the VLC 
repo, and this isn't the first time I've seen it this slow.
There's periods where it's decently responsive, but I feel like I have 
seen it slow more often than fast.

It's probably also bogged down by the flood of LLM scrapers, but there 
do not seem to be any countermeasures in place.

> On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 7:44 AM Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all
>>
>> Do people want Forgejo or Gitlab on code.ffmpeg.org for testing?
>>
>> F. code.ffmpeg.org should run Forgejo
>> G. code.ffmpeg.org should run Gitlab
>>
>> all GA members can vote, by publically replying here with a
>> "F." / "Forgejo" vs "G." / "Gitlab"
>> End time is in 7 days unless teh community wants to extend that.
>> (or do people want a formal vote to be setup? on vote.ffmpeg.org)
>>
>> After we decide what to run on code.ffmpeg.org, I intend to
>> * apply the CI patches which timo currently keeps rebasing on the Forgejo
>> git
>>    (maybe timo can post these to ffmpeg-devel)
>>
>> * extend my github cronjob to autosync Forgejo or Gitlab too
>>    (or someone else can set one up)
>>
>> * announce code.ffmpeg.org publically so people can start submitting
>>    and reviewing on it as an alternative to the ML
>>
>> * and a month or 2 after that we can re-asses how many people use
>> code.ffmpeg.org
>>    and how many use the ML. Then we could decide to keep using both
>>    in parallel or switch back to ML or just use code.ffmpeg.org. Or in fact
>>    we could switch between Gitlab or Forgejo here still as well.
>>
>> thx
>>
>> --
>> Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
>>
>> Frequently ignored answer#1 FFmpeg bugs should be sent to our bugtracker.
>> User
>> questions about the command line tools should be sent to the ffmpeg-user
>> ML.
>> And questions about how to use libav* should be sent to the libav-user ML.
>> _______________________________________________
>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
>> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>>
>> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
>> ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> 
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".