From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E81450D4 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2023 22:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4CE368BD86; Fri, 6 Jan 2023 00:06:28 +0200 (EET) Received: from mailrelay.ngus.net (mailrelay.ngus.net [109.237.26.52]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87C2268BD6E for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2023 00:06:22 +0200 (EET) Received: from cpc102338-sgyl38-2-0-cust655.18-2.cable.virginm.net ([77.102.34.144] helo=zebop) by mailrelay.ngus.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1pDYNR-009yFo-P8 for ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2023 22:06:21 +0000 Received: from [192.168.101.3] by zebop with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1pDYNQ-004BM8-3K for ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2023 22:06:21 +0000 Message-ID: <68882418-b8a9-707a-2523-8d641793abc7@ngus.net> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 22:06:19 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Content-Language: en-US To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org References: <20230105205842.1442824-1-tim@ngus.net> <20230105205842.1442824-2-tim@ngus.net> From: Tim Angus In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -5.8 (-----) Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/1] avformat/assenc: fix incorrect copy of null terminator X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 05/01/2023 22:03, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote: >> Yes I did; no failures locally, though I see there are failures in this >> "patchwork" thingy, presumably that is running extra tests? > Did you run FATE with samples or without? No idea, I just ran "make fate" as per the submission checklist. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".