Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [FATE PATCH] Properly list test errors when there are no failed tests

["Martin Storsjö" <martin@martin.st>]

On Fri, 27 Jun 2025, Kacper Michajlow wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025, 14:44 Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2025, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Martin
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 01:57:05PM +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote:
>> >> If there were failures while running tests, e.g. if failing to
>> >> compile checkasm or any other of the test programs, there are no
>> >> failed tests per se, and the number of succeessful tests is
>> >> equal to the total number of tests.
>> >>
>> >> For these cases, check the job status code instead of declaring
>> >> them as a full success.
>> >> ---
>> >>  history.cgi | 2 +-
>> >>  index.cgi   | 2 +-
>> >>  report.cgi  | 6 +++++-
>> >>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > sounds reasonable, but ill leave the perl review to someone who actually
>> > knows perl
>>
>> I've tested it locally, so if we have nobody else volunteering to review
>> it, is that enough?
>>
>> > Its a few years since the last change to fateserver, i think we dont
>> > have a script to update the checkout on the server from a git push.
>> > Its a while, i dont remember exactly :)
>> > so you have to update that checkout after pushing possibly
>>
>> I don't think I have access to any such server, but if it's ok with you
>> can I (try to) push this patch to the gitosis repo, and then ask some
>> admin (Timo?) to possibly update a checkout somewhere.
>>
>> // Martin
>>
>
> There is also https://fatebeta.ffmpeg.org/, should it be updated for parity
> with perl version?

AFAIK that site prints this aspect correctly.

// Martin
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".