From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C91545370 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD1C68BE21; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 23:32:01 +0200 (EET) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4E9168BDFA for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 23:31:54 +0200 (EET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F3C32009B5 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:31:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap49 ([10.202.2.99]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:31:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1674682312; x=1674768712; bh=HIo6nEduPzHxu0EEChY2M7sHILbN wm46fSup18V/qME=; b=Z5lCBlwJdUywRngaFE7xQgfs0ZbSTWb2uzP+m334xeTS RNZJJZyIIXqDDKp7hL+DPHnKOdQXsuNUsn14zOpjGsGFNYbNNB32wHwe8cpWOrvC asjHv8dvD8E9+QvpyqNOSnr+JA8jnqgYjjpZo/5RlBtSs1vBGYtF+OA3L+FW7I99 5ujvQ0dKSTv2AbQaTkPr3l6EmQvz9AJkreJFneQdd4m6Byt0pGe635Csr6bcA5AH guitBvDku8fiEOeLjoEdkkLDChta6CTgXBEa1E3X/7gNCCHesPnUIk0nICvba4x+ Rjjd8X59IOzQWXIPxR+6sQ5W7BrOqmZRe2wsScMVhA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedruddvvddgudehvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesth dtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdflvggrnhdquegrphhtihhsthgvucfmvghmphhffdcu oehjsgesvhhiuggvohhlrghnrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeiiefgvdffte ekkeffvdeiffeijeethfevteeutdegvdegfeekgfektdelheefgfenucevlhhushhtvghr ufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjsgesvhhiuggvohhlrghnrd horhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i06904239:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8AE9E15A008E; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:31:52 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-85-gd6d859e0cf-fm-20230116.001-gd6d859e0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <4ab4ef51-e0bb-474e-be7c-a5b689c0542e@betaapp.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20230116133840.512-1-jamrial@gmail.com> <167457514256.4503.7425182589774123747@lain.khirnov.net> <6b01240d-95e2-db84-c40b-329a72b958c5@gmail.com> <7debdfb5-bbb3-e4c6-f95-a89a463d3abd@passwd.hu> <4997c7ce-3db3-4062-b3b4-f65719debc43@betaapp.fastmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 22:31:32 +0100 From: "Jean-Baptiste Kempf" To: ffmpeg-devel Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 00/26] Major library version bump X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, at 22:29, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 1/25/23, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, at 22:20, Paul B Mahol wrote: >>> On 1/25/23, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: >>>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, at 22:03, Marton Balint wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, at 21:08, Marton Balint wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, James Almer wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 1/24/2023 12:45 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote: >>>>>>>>> So to summarize the discussion so far: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * nobody is strongly arguing for an instability period after the >>>>>>>>> bump, >>>>>>>>> and there are good reasons against it, therefore we should NOT >>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * the bump can be done either as bump-then-remove or >>>>>>>>> remove-then-bump >>>>>>>>> * there are advantages and disadvantages for both of those, >>>>>>>>> nobody >>>>>>>>> expressed a strong preference for either, so you can keep >>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I misunderstood or missed something, or >>>>>>>>> somebody >>>>>>>>> has a new opinion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Since the instability period doesn't seem popular, if anyone has >>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>> patches >>>>>>>> for ABI changes (enum value or field offset changes, removing >>>>>>>> avpriv_ >>>>>>>> functions we forgot about, etc), then please send them asap so i can >>>>>>>> push >>>>>>>> them all at the same time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok, I can send the frame number changes tomorrow. When do you plan to >>>>>>> do >>>>>>> the actual bump? I assumed the last 5.x release should be branched >>>>>>> first. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why? 5.1 was already branched out. >>>>> >>>>> And is missing 6 months of development. >>>> >>>> So you want us to release both 6.0 and 5.2 at the same time? >>>> I don't get it. >>> >>> So user do not need to immediately update code that uses old API to >>> get new fancy features. >> >> And when do you stop doing this? > > After 6.0 tagged. > >> Also, as 5.1 is LTS, is 5.2 LTS too? >> > > No, its not. So, we tag 5.2 out of master? Then bump, and tag 6.0 too? And then branch out 6.0? -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President +33 672 704 734 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".