Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc/vc1dsp: match C block layout in inv_trans_4x8_rvv

["Rémi Denis-Courmont" <remi@remlab.net>]

Le tiistaina 11. kesäkuuta 2024, 15.23.11 EEST James Almer a écrit :
> On 6/11/2024 9:19 AM, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> > Le 11 juin 2024 15:09:42 GMT+03:00, "Ronald S. Bultje" 
<rsbultje@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 3:20 PM Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi@remlab.net> 
wrote:
> >>> Although checkasm does not verify this, the decoder requires that the
> >>> transform updates the input block exactly like the C code does.
> >> 
> >> Would it be possible to update the checkasm test to verify this?
> > 
> > In theory, it has to be possible. I can't do it for lack of knowledge
> > about VC-1 though. James tried to make such a patch but it ended up
> > failing both AArch64 and RVV 8x4 transforms. I don't know if this points
> > to a latent bug or is a false positive.
> My patch added a memcmp of the block buffer. If it fails, then the asm
> implementation is probably writing more than it should.

The patch has two bugs that end up cancelling one another.

> Can you see what bytes don't match? It might give you an idea of what
> store instruction is touching the wrong bytes.

The RVV transform is failing because it stores different values in the right 
places. I will attach patches here, but it is entirely unclear to me if this 
is necessary at all; at least, it does not seem to fix anything in FATE, and it 
causes the pre-existing AArch64 functions to fail checkasm.

-- 
レミ・デニ-クールモン
http://www.remlab.net/



_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".