From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DE054C915 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 09:23:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ffmpeg.org; i=@ffmpeg.org; q=dns/txt; s=mail; t=1758187290; h=message-id : date : mime-version : to : references : in-reply-to : reply-to : subject : list-id : list-archive : list-archive : list-help : list-owner : list-post : list-subscribe : list-unsubscribe : from : cc : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=VR7qWRy08VoflFGrafgYCKYecZMAiO3U7g0O597ikWY=; b=C2xdsEfHJeIh2E2+wHbCeFyYNz4b1GK23KnO20cu5lcfipU52cUImewZzkNDSMlnKVZsp PaZIXwAJmmyl3CpayKEQpcXVI0vYOPpL2OkemV4UhrQq8kZhbBpoG2JJuYplAG3ZJwn+qBy PtJBegdmmV2Ew5ZCpQIljf0Pvojv4vKQw/sbby/yhShVBuiI1cyvhvKlpJWFJ9Yp3Vy0n7Q 5zTEaN7dkcf3YEZ3PlVhkCFXR9hIJJQhllE2BN9mDniT0zOzR1onMRKq+y3Mb/wXLsq+NHU W0ccG+k8d/fsbOV+J7C0LZSnRa8k75IovWZenaGKgFhGJVHlp1WGXO/z9o0Q== Received: from [172.19.0.4] (unknown [172.19.0.4]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D11D68E7E8; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 12:21:30 +0300 (EEST) ARC-Seal: i=1; cv=none; a=rsa-sha256; d=ffmpeg.org; s=arc; t=1758187288; b=FB1GjN6WCLjzaFyMpnO0rF0B20QFyO21HE5MSXD/LUBtQuLX7exxW+epKOGeNozGTWRmR FYmfTvpn3d/fjjYkCpMlfYC3VmaTxSKjP6vEE7iGpi/dpoY1uocTnNemX777+pXV188NQRD 5pbh3A9bJbQ63tq1GCBWagr1pN2e/Lo7rAxP1GF1LL6foB1wpvlqHasXPCXKu70zyBNQRVL fu/iKIU1nLQIMtklkNfq5Fq14jD6yhL/bWZJ+bm8FwFXWGZv0N09TI1T+201MZsd9nAIzDg XkLzT45b8FFzYX9h/h8FvyqUefRoZLd04+oRJ2SRPpk/PJS1FqHPtjlv6zLA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffmpeg.org; s=arc; t=1758187288; h=from : sender : reply-to : subject : date : message-id : to : cc : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : content-id : content-description : resent-date : resent-from : resent-sender : resent-to : resent-cc : resent-message-id : in-reply-to : references : list-id : list-help : list-unsubscribe : list-subscribe : list-post : list-owner : list-archive; bh=VR7qWRy08VoflFGrafgYCKYecZMAiO3U7g0O597ikWY=; b=HQOJZjdPd28ENXfYBwupNKzyiI3QifnjUVqjso/AyXGmWgJ15mBAMoG/+2893WgcgyDD9 XHN4AqpySKk49EEDYpAxQy5Or0f/6b4H3XbVt1Sx1M++g3nxtkNEX2klY9OHuX26yB9qe4P QoU2uYyb0l9OV+ZJln9IkZA0toYdAvaqPR2GXk4sAg+nY9/ssO9Xdj6fRMTwHjSWQ+BbbfM Yj8J9pBuEkBzAw1kr2VKAP9twvVDQBmsZQaOfXmr9it7jSN6LHCUY/FFIOi2Qs/pzaPw8By E6OEK0MKJoKDb4F6IpehuNkYlE29RZBOHTWAB9Z+yVrWhSYpBCTV3FSG96+A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; ffmpeg.org; dkim=fail; arc=none; dmarc=none Authentication-Results: ffmpeg.org; dkim=fail; arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=none Received: from mout-p-101.mailbox.org (mout-p-101.mailbox.org [80.241.56.151]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DBB468006F for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 12:21:09 +0300 (EEST) Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-101.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cS99D316kz9sv4 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 11:20:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <45c05995-7e7a-4843-98e6-ba5fec57593b@gyani.pro> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 14:50:44 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org References: <20250916084900.GR29660@pb2> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20250916084900.GR29660@pb2> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4cS99D316kz9sv4 Message-ID-Hash: MIIGXA2CTEOBVL54JFKQN753NDQWRWN2 X-Message-ID-Hash: MIIGXA2CTEOBVL54JFKQN753NDQWRWN2 X-MailFrom: SRS0=C2qv=35=gyani.pro=ffmpeg@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-0; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-1; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-2; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-3; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL] [VOTE] code.ffmpeg.org vs. ML List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Archived-At: Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: From: Gyan Doshi via ffmpeg-devel Cc: Gyan Doshi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 2025-09-16 02:19 pm, Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > Hi all > > 2 months ago we voted on testing Forgejo vs Gitlab, we picked and tested > Forgejo. And as said in that vote, (and surprisingly, i have not forgotten it) > heres the "after testing" discussion and vote > > do we want to keep Forgejo or switch back to the ML workflow > (or something else) > > F. keep Forgejo as primary forge for patch/git workflow > M. switch back to the ML for patch/git workflow Forgejo. Regards, Gyan _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org To unsubscribe send an email to ffmpeg-devel-leave@ffmpeg.org