Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin Storsjö via ffmpeg-devel" <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
To: Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Cc: "Michael Niedermayer" <michael@niedermayer.cc>,
	"Martin Storsjö" <martin@martin.st>
Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL] [VOTE] code.ffmpeg.org vs. ML
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 22:54:19 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <442e6eb-5688-eb5d-c2ea-2130674cfa83@martin.st> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916184956.GS29660@pb2>

On Tue, 16 Sep 2025, Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 02:12:20PM +0300, Martin Storsjö via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2025, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> 2 months ago we voted on testing Forgejo vs Gitlab, we picked and tested
>>> Forgejo. And as said in that vote, (and surprisingly, i have not forgotten it)
>>> heres the "after testing" discussion and vote
>>>
>>> do we want to keep Forgejo or switch back to the ML workflow
>>> (or something else)
>>>
>>> F. keep Forgejo as primary forge for patch/git workflow
>>> M. switch back to the ML for patch/git workflow
>>>
>>> all GA members can vote, by publically replying here with a
>>> "F." / "Forgejo" vs "M." / "ML"
>>
>
>> Any vote on anything that can be even potentially contentious should be made
>> with closed voting, not requiring everybody to publicly state their
>> preference.
>
> You mean a "secret ballot"
>
> First, id like to say thanks, for you commenting here, even if we dont
> agree. I think such debate is a good thing as long as its friendly
> and you always have been friendly!
>
> my current oppinion on the subject:
>
> The main goal of a secret ballot is to protect the citizen so she can delegate
> her power to a "office holder" freely

No, that is not the point at all.

The point is having one's voice and vote count, without needing to 
disclose it publicly. On potentially contentious matters, people eligible 
to vote may wish to do so, without having to publicly state their 
preference attached to their name.

Or like Rémi explained it in 
https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2025-August/347939.html:

> A public ballot, also known as plebiscite, is by nature a performative 
> exercise.
> 
> A secret ballot allows people to express their opinion based purely on 
> the technical and moral merits without the fear of a bad perception and 
> self-censorship.

// Martin
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ffmpeg-devel-leave@ffmpeg.org

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-16 19:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-16  8:49 [FFmpeg-devel] " Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-16  9:00 ` [FFmpeg-devel] " Diederick C. Niehorster via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-16 11:04 ` Timo Rothenpieler via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-16 11:12 ` Martin Storsjö via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-16 18:49   ` Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-16 19:54     ` Martin Storsjö via ffmpeg-devel [this message]
2025-09-17  9:41       ` Nicolas George via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-18 12:00       ` Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-16 11:13 ` Martin Storsjö via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-16 11:54 ` Marvin Scholz via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-16 13:59 ` Alexander Strasser via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-16 20:39   ` Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-16 21:12 ` Balint Marton via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-17 14:24   ` Timo Rothenpieler via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-17 18:32     ` Marton Balint via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-17 23:41       ` Timo Rothenpieler via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-18  7:02         ` Nicolas George via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-18  8:52           ` Jacob Lifshay via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-18  9:15             ` Nicolas George via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-18  9:49               ` Jacob Lifshay via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-18 12:18             ` Niklas Haas via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-18 17:44         ` Marton Balint via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-17 14:46   ` Niklas Haas via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-17  3:57 ` Philip Langdale via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-17  9:42 ` Nicolas George via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-17 14:44 ` Niklas Haas via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-18  9:10   ` Zhao Zhili via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-17 14:53 ` softworkz . via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-18  9:20 ` Gyan Doshi via ffmpeg-devel
2025-09-19  7:46 ` Peter Ross via ffmpeg-devel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=442e6eb-5688-eb5d-c2ea-2130674cfa83@martin.st \
    --to=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
    --cc=martin@martin.st \
    --cc=michael@niedermayer.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
		ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
	public-inbox-index ffmpegdev

Example config snippet for mirrors.


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git