From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4108740327 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 13:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BB668ADF6; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:48:33 +0200 (EET) Received: from canta.com.ar (mail.canta.com.ar [162.217.64.29]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5E6D68A7C8 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:48:26 +0200 (EET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canta.com.ar; s=mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=QykahE+o5Idnwsu+joFkvvmnUmbbuV9dJAYVyYAdBgo=; b=nAcy2EmJue2ly1lJSTsnKRG6Zs dRRrTK0zMAV+f60QOjrRsvK4Bku9YXfs9DBiJqCWjPzpweNdMBX16svJPi+zW5KDEcxZUbZLb6JXR byw2gEgNIFGJoJVN+V0AoQy2sd+bcrdNkvBXO68JW+bZW9vO9WMxSMx2oRlMoMt6Eeog=; Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=canta.com.ar) by canta.com.ar with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1mzJ1b-0002cs-2n for ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:48:23 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:48:23 -0300 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_Cantar=C3=ADn?= To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org Message-ID: <4336446d9feccaf9439e4378629a4578@canta.com.ar> X-Sender: canta@canta.com.ar Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Politics X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: > > The more the focus is moving to "a single frame" doesn't matter, > the more will that conversation create the impression that my patchset > would be lacking precision. > This is a possibility, indeed. Yet, the less one answers, the more it also looks like the issue is dead and/or some argument was the last word on the issue. Neither are the case. Also, there's the constant claim of "you didn't listened to me"; not answering surely leads to that effect, and answering puts the burden of proof to the people stating the hypothetical issue. OTOH, people here could be very knowledgeable and experienced, thus actually maybe being onto something. Debating fantasy scenarios could be a chore and even a waste of time, but asking for proper input files is not, and this gives the oportunity to deal with such possible tests. No input files so far, of course, as I also do believe the "frame-perfect serious issue" is simply not real: not any problem in your code, not any real-life use case. We'll see if anyone brings such real example, with files to test. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".