From: Timo Rothenpieler <timo@rothenpieler.org>
To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] web: announce code.ffmpeg.org
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 00:57:16 +0200
Message-ID: <3ea63883-4510-40c4-b6e5-39b30cae5e26@rothenpieler.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250726224409.GS29660@pb2>
On 7/27/2025 12:44 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi Timo
>
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2025 at 10:41:57PM +0200, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
>> On 7/26/2025 10:24 PM, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
>>> On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 at 22:14, Timo Rothenpieler <timo@rothenpieler.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 7/26/2025 10:01 PM, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
>>>>> On 7/26/2025 8:29 PM, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> [...]
>>> Also, I don't think the current ML workflow is very sophisticated on
>>> ffmpeg-devel, so there are likely not many tools to migrate to the new
>>> one.
>>
>> You'd be surprised about the sophisticated tooling a lot of people have
>> built around patch wrangling via a mailing-list.
>>
>> A lot of people will need to learn an entire new workflow, and I can
>> absolutely understand that being forced to do so from one day to the next is
>> very disruptive and off putting.
>
> yes, we need decissions that everyone is on board with, even if they
> did not vote for the winning choice.
>
> I think the gitlab vs forgejo decission was such a decission, it had
> a very clear outcome.
>
> This testing period can show that forgejo works better and that it leads
> to more contributors and fewer unreviewed patches.
> Or it can fail to do so.
>
> I think having the result of that testing, could convince most people
> which is the right choice
>
>
> [...]
>>
>>> It's just my personal opinion and it doesn't reflect anyone else in
>>> the community.
>>
>> I'm completely with you that we desperately need to move forward.
>> But there just are a lot of people who've been with the project for a long
>> time who are not comfortable with it or outright reject it.
>> Do we really want to just leave them behind, and not even give them a chance
>> to learn new tools?
>
> yes, exactly, i think we should make sure everyone moves together
>
> and just speaking about myself how do i replace git send email ?
> do we have a drop in replacement for that ?
Pretty much just with a push to a branch in your personal fork of
FFmpeg/FFmpeg on code.ffmpeg.org
When you push to a new branch, git itself will echo you a link to create
a new Pull Request from it right then.
You can of course also ignore that link and manually create it via the
Web UI, or use the tea CLI tool to create it.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-26 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-22 3:53 Lynne
2025-07-22 8:44 ` Kacper Michajlow
2025-07-22 9:15 ` Jacob Lifshay
2025-07-25 3:40 ` compn
2025-07-25 3:58 ` Jacob Lifshay
2025-07-25 4:36 ` compn
2025-07-25 11:41 ` Nicolas George
2025-07-25 14:20 ` Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
2025-07-23 4:05 ` Lynne
2025-07-22 15:01 ` Leo Izen
2025-07-23 4:01 ` Lynne
2025-07-22 23:04 ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-07-23 4:01 ` Lynne
2025-07-23 9:16 ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-07-23 9:39 ` Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
2025-07-23 9:59 ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-07-23 10:02 ` Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
2025-07-23 11:48 ` Nicolas George
2025-07-25 4:05 ` compn
2025-07-26 14:57 ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-07-23 9:38 ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-07-23 11:49 ` Nicolas George
2025-07-26 17:03 ` Derek Buitenhuis
2025-07-26 19:29 ` Timo Rothenpieler
2025-07-26 20:01 ` Derek Buitenhuis
2025-07-26 20:14 ` Timo Rothenpieler
2025-07-26 20:24 ` Kacper Michajlow
2025-07-26 20:29 ` Derek Buitenhuis
2025-07-26 20:41 ` Timo Rothenpieler
2025-07-26 20:45 ` Derek Buitenhuis
2025-07-26 21:07 ` Kacper Michajlow
2025-07-26 21:18 ` Timo Rothenpieler
2025-07-26 22:44 ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-07-26 22:57 ` Timo Rothenpieler [this message]
2025-07-26 22:48 ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-07-26 20:28 ` Derek Buitenhuis
2025-07-26 20:14 ` Kacper Michajlow
2025-07-26 20:23 ` Timo Rothenpieler
2025-07-26 20:29 ` Kacper Michajlow
2025-07-26 20:33 ` Derek Buitenhuis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ea63883-4510-40c4-b6e5-39b30cae5e26@rothenpieler.org \
--to=timo@rothenpieler.org \
--cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:
git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
public-inbox-index ffmpegdev
Example config snippet for mirrors.
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git