[FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL] [VOTE] code.ffmpeg.org vs. ML

["Martin Storsjö via ffmpeg-devel" <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>]

On Tue, 16 Sep 2025, Michael Niedermayer wrote:

> Hi all
>
> 2 months ago we voted on testing Forgejo vs Gitlab, we picked and tested
> Forgejo. And as said in that vote, (and surprisingly, i have not forgotten it)
> heres the "after testing" discussion and vote
>
> do we want to keep Forgejo or switch back to the ML workflow
> (or something else)
>
> F. keep Forgejo as primary forge for patch/git workflow
> M. switch back to the ML for patch/git workflow
>
> all GA members can vote, by publically replying here with a
> "F." / "Forgejo" vs "M." / "ML"

Any vote on anything that can be even potentially contentious should be 
made with closed voting, not requiring everybody to publicly state their 
preference.

// Martin

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ffmpeg-devel-leave@ffmpeg.org