On 10/26/2025 10:39 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi James
> 
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 07:38:39PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> On 10/26/2025 12:26 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> Hi Everyone
>>>
>>> As requested, reposting this, as a new thread
>>>
>>> For context please see:
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VkcAvqV24c
>>> https://lists.ffmpeg.org/archives/list/ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org/thread/PZL3NMBYJJ7RHEJ2NEGE26R2HHXKRQ2S/
>>> Subject: Twitter/X spat on Youtube
>>>
>>> Should the delegation, from where this came from, be revoked to FFmpeg social media?
>>> (vote ends in 7 days)
>>>
>>> Please reply on ffmpeg-devel with your choice:
>>>
>>> [R] revoke access
>>>
>>> [K] keep access
>>>
>>> thx
>>
>> I'm sorry, but we have a real method agreed upon for voting with Condorcet,
> 
> The question about revoking access has 2 options, so a simple vote is equivalent to Condorcet
> 
> 
>> and a call for a vote like this on a Sunday afternoon with virtually no
>> discussion whatsoever is not acceptable.
> 
> its 7 days so theres as many of each weekday as theres a sunday

Sending this a day most people are not even going to check their email 
or forget about it after giving it a short glance is not the same as 
sending it when everyone is on call.
See: Corporations making unpopular announcements on a Friday night, 
hoping most people will not care enough.

And day of the week aside, you started a vote unprompted the same day 
the related complaint showed up, without even having the chance for 
discussion. That's incredibly rushed.

> 
> Multiple people have raised complaints about our social media use over months
> At least 3 FFmpeg developers (thats not including myself) and that one youtuber.
> 
> Noone did anything effective about that
> 
> And what I can do, is to revoke the delegation, or not revoke it.

Well, if i have to acknowledge this irregular and very questionable vote 
given all the background that has been provided (A bounty to get him 
kicked? Really? How are we humoring this shit?), i obviously choose K, 
as should everyone else, and also ask we stop this infighting, more so 
now that we have external parties fueling it.

> 
> So I basically asked, should i revoke it
> Asking people to discuss before i ask them if i should revoke it would be
> kind of wierd
> 
> thx
> 
> [...]