Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Almer via ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
To: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Cc: FFmpeg development discussions and patches
	<ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>,
	ga@ffmpeg.org, James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL][VOTE] Revoke social media delegation
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 18:39:52 -0300
Message-ID: <3b41f7d7-b777-4a3a-ba5a-c2990c4b069e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aP7NSo9ZnT1vkW3l@neo>


[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2405 bytes --]

On 10/26/2025 10:39 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi James
> 
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 07:38:39PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> On 10/26/2025 12:26 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> Hi Everyone
>>>
>>> As requested, reposting this, as a new thread
>>>
>>> For context please see:
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VkcAvqV24c
>>> https://lists.ffmpeg.org/archives/list/ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org/thread/PZL3NMBYJJ7RHEJ2NEGE26R2HHXKRQ2S/
>>> Subject: Twitter/X spat on Youtube
>>>
>>> Should the delegation, from where this came from, be revoked to FFmpeg social media?
>>> (vote ends in 7 days)
>>>
>>> Please reply on ffmpeg-devel with your choice:
>>>
>>> [R] revoke access
>>>
>>> [K] keep access
>>>
>>> thx
>>
>> I'm sorry, but we have a real method agreed upon for voting with Condorcet,
> 
> The question about revoking access has 2 options, so a simple vote is equivalent to Condorcet
> 
> 
>> and a call for a vote like this on a Sunday afternoon with virtually no
>> discussion whatsoever is not acceptable.
> 
> its 7 days so theres as many of each weekday as theres a sunday

Sending this a day most people are not even going to check their email 
or forget about it after giving it a short glance is not the same as 
sending it when everyone is on call.
See: Corporations making unpopular announcements on a Friday night, 
hoping most people will not care enough.

And day of the week aside, you started a vote unprompted the same day 
the related complaint showed up, without even having the chance for 
discussion. That's incredibly rushed.

> 
> Multiple people have raised complaints about our social media use over months
> At least 3 FFmpeg developers (thats not including myself) and that one youtuber.
> 
> Noone did anything effective about that
> 
> And what I can do, is to revoke the delegation, or not revoke it.

Well, if i have to acknowledge this irregular and very questionable vote 
given all the background that has been provided (A bounty to get him 
kicked? Really? How are we humoring this shit?), i obviously choose K, 
as should everyone else, and also ask we stop this infighting, more so 
now that we have external parties fueling it.

> 
> So I basically asked, should i revoke it
> Asking people to discuss before i ask them if i should revoke it would be
> kind of wierd
> 
> thx
> 
> [...]


[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 163 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ffmpeg-devel-leave@ffmpeg.org

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-27 21:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-26 15:26 [FFmpeg-devel] " Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 15:51 ` [FFmpeg-devel] " Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 17:13   ` Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 17:34     ` Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 17:45     ` Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 16:50 ` Lynne via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27  2:22   ` Steven Liu via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27 11:22   ` Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 16:54 ` Tomas Härdin via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 17:51   ` Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 18:18     ` Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 22:34     ` James Almer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27 10:03       ` Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27 11:12     ` Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-26 22:38 ` James Almer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27  1:39   ` Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27 21:39     ` James Almer via ffmpeg-devel [this message]
2025-10-27 11:26 ` Vittorio Giovara via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27 19:53 ` Nicolas George via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27 20:59 ` jamessmithswe64--- via ffmpeg-devel
2025-10-27 22:52 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf via ffmpeg-devel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3b41f7d7-b777-4a3a-ba5a-c2990c4b069e@gmail.com \
    --to=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
    --cc=ga@ffmpeg.org \
    --cc=jamrial@gmail.com \
    --cc=michael@niedermayer.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
		ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
	public-inbox-index ffmpegdev

Example config snippet for mirrors.


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git