From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D3447A0A for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 12:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCA268CFDF; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:22:19 +0200 (EET) Received: from shout02.mail.de (shout02.mail.de [62.201.172.25]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB61268CA1F for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:22:13 +0200 (EET) Received: from postfix02.mail.de (postfix02.bt.mail.de [10.0.121.126]) by shout02.mail.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED25A240D5C for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 13:22:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp01.mail.de (smtp04.bt.mail.de [10.0.121.214]) by postfix02.mail.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CB7A03C3 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 13:22:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp01.mail.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D0302400B7 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 13:22:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <33f231d0-c5a3-4b57-9db3-e459c43a8644@mail.de> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 13:22:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org References: <169917852563.11195.3233039152331028161@lain.khirnov.net> <170116129299.8914.7788150105908081735@lain.khirnov.net> <170117779381.8914.2683322584082928565@lain.khirnov.net> <170118664803.1197.13636719804914185990@lain.khirnov.net> <689cf145-9211-4786-afe8-943f80c895f3@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <689cf145-9211-4786-afe8-943f80c895f3@gmail.com> X-purgate: clean X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information) X-purgate-type: clean X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information) X-purgate: clean X-purgate-size: 1020 X-purgate-ID: 154282::1701260532-064748B7-CD96E240/0/0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: TC/CC elections X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Cc: Thilo Borgmann Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 28.11.23 21:30, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > On 11/28/2023 3:50 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote: >> Calling things generically bad is the opposite of helpful. > I cannot offer help on making a paragraph that I don't fully > understand become more comprehensible, as that would require > I understand it fully. > > But, I would again like to state these votes should be scrapped > and redone. People literally voted the opposite of what they wanted > to by accident, due to this. > FWIW the type in of weights is one of the two options to do a proportional representation for the vote. The other is the one we had used so far, by ranking the candidates from 1st to n-th. Both should serve our needs for proportional representation AFAICT and I don't assume they'd give us different results of the vote. But maybe Anton had a reason to pick one over the other. If Anton decides it's worth redoing it, we maybe just do the other option and be a bit more resilient to misinterpretation. -Thilo _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".