Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] ffprobe: restore reporting error code for failed inputs

[Gyan Doshi <ffmpeg@gyani.pro>]

Pushed as

d5544f6457ad06987311beda0e4b7c08bf52915c to master
and
4e4cc6e56a899f6b4302e80dbcd6b4462f340905 to 5.1

On 2022-08-17 12:43 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
>
>
> On 2022-08-17 12:37 pm, Marton Balint wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 17 Aug 2022, Gyan Doshi wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2022-08-17 04:36 am, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>>>>  On date Tuesday 2022-08-16 00:04:10 +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
>>>>>  c11fb46731 led to a regression whereby the return code for missing
>>>>>  input or input probe is overridden by writer close return code and
>>>>>  hence not conveyed in the exit code.
>>>>>  ---
>>>>>    fftools/ffprobe.c | 6 +++++-
>>>>>    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>>  Affects 5.1 so will need to be backported there.
>>>>>
>>>>>  diff --git a/fftools/ffprobe.c b/fftools/ffprobe.c
>>>>>  index ad633ccc44..8983dc28cc 100644
>>>>>  --- a/fftools/ffprobe.c
>>>>>  +++ b/fftools/ffprobe.c
>>>>> @@  -4032,7 +4032,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>>>>        WriterContext *wctx;
>>>>>        char *buf;
>>>>>        char *w_name = NULL, *w_args = NULL;
>>>>>  -    int ret, i;
>>>>>  +    int ret, input_ret, i;
>>>>>
>>>>>        init_dynload();
>>>>>
>>>>> @@  -4156,10 +4156,14 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>>>>                    show_error(wctx, ret);
>>>>>            }
>>>>>    +        input_ret = ret;
>>>>>  +
>>>>>            writer_print_section_footer(wctx);
>>>>>            ret = writer_close(&wctx);
>>>>>            if (ret < 0)
>>>>>                av_log(NULL, AV_LOG_ERROR, "Writing output failed: 
>>>>> %s\n",
>>>>>  av_err2str(ret));
>>>>>  +
>>>>>  +        ret = FFMIN(ret, input_ret);
>>>>  maybe we should give priority to input_ret in case they are both
>>>>  negative?
>>>>
>>>>  return input_ret < 0 ? input_ret : ret;
>>>
>>> Scripts usually depend on exit code being 0 or something else. Also, 
>>> error is logged for both input failure and writer_close failure, so 
>>> it doesn't matter.
>>> Finally, input_ret is not initialized if writer_open fails, so we 
>>> shouldn't be referencing it outside.
>>
>> I would do something like
>>
>> ret2 = writer_close();
>> ret = FFMIN(ret2, ret);
>>
>> But fine either way, please push any version you prefer, this has 
>> been broken for too long. Sorry about that.
>
> The only diff is which return does the new variable store. I like my 
> var name better :/
>
> Will push in a couple of hours, 5.1 as well
>
> Regards,
> Gyan
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".